TITLE

What level of scrutiny is required in an antitrust case?

AUTHOR(S)
Sfikas, Peter M.
PUB. DATE
April 1999
SOURCE
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Apr99, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p581
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Part II. Presents the second of a two-part series on the California Dental Association's (CDA) antitrust case before the United States Supreme Court. CDA's argument that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has no jurisdiction over nonprofit professional associations; Impropriety of the FTC's use of the cursory standard of review; Findings of the Administrative Law Judge.
ACCESSION #
2037765

 

Related Articles

  • Dangerous liaisons. Page, Leigh // Modern Physician;Sep2002, Vol. 6 Issue 9, p5 

    Recommends a way for independent practices associations (IPA) to avoid antitrust scrutiny by the U.S. government. Percentage of increase in the spendings on antitrust investigations; Requirement to IPA by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission; Details on the plans of MedSouth.

  • When the FTC calls. Taylor, Mark // Modern Healthcare;11/8/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 45, pS3 

    Presents several suggestions to hospital organizations in settling an antitrust investigation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Importance of taking allegations seriously when facing antitrust regulators from FTC; Negotiation of health providers and their lawyer with the antitrust...

  • Intel settles with FTC. Kidman, Angus // Australian Personal Computer;May99, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p22 

    Reports on the settlement agreed between the United States Federal Trade Commission and Intel Corp. to prevent an antitrust investigation. Details of the settlement; Reactions from the company and the government on the settlement.

  • Gleeful Google. Post, Ashley // InsideCounsel;Feb2013, Vol. 24 Issue 254, p12 

    The article informs that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission concluded its antitrust investigation against Google Inc. without finding evidence that it has influenced its search results in partiality to its own products and services.

  • Judge Rules Rambus Destroyed Potential Evidence. Romanelli, Alex // Electronic News;3/10/2003, Vol. 49 Issue 10, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the ruling of the judge James Timony that Rambus Inc. have destroyed documents that is important to the U.S. government's antitrust investigation. Statement released by Timony; Antitrust investigation conducted by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Rambus.

  • FTC charges Rambus.  // Electronics Weekly;6/26/2002, Issue 2058, p2 

    Reports on the allegation by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission against Rambus for deceiving the standards setting agency Joint Electron Device Engineering Council in June 2002. Basis for the antitrust allegations; Reaction of Rambus General Counsel John Danforth to the allegations.

  • CVS Caremark probe is concluded by FTC.  // Chain Drug Review;1/16/2012, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p3 

    The article reports that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has concluded a two-year investigation of CVS Caremark Corp. without the alleged antitrust violations or anticompetitive behavior.

  • DEALING WITH ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES PRIOR TO FILING OF SUIT. Reycraft, George D. // Business Lawyer;Jan1970, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p715 

    Deals with the federal antitrust enforcement agencies prior to filing of suit. Procedural aspects with relationship to mergers and acquisitions; Limitations of the Federal Trade Commission; Importance of approval from regulatory agencies for merger clearances.

  • FTC gives green light to `OPEN' pharmacy network.  // Drug Store News;6/28/99, Vol. 21 Issue 10, pCP4 

    Announces that the Orange Pharmacy Equitable Network (OPEN) in southern California has been cleared from its antitrust case as announced by the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Details on the letter of Richard Feinstein of the FTC.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics