TITLE

INTERSECTIONALITY AS "CATCH 22": WHY IDENTITY PERFORMANCE DEMANDS ARE NEITHER HARMLESS NOR REASONABLE

AUTHOR(S)
Ramachandran, Gowri
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2005, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p299
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Explores the potential harm of private requirements to perform one's identity by using the case of intersectionals, or persons who are member of low-status category. Description of identity performance and assimilationist demands as distinguished from traditional forms of discrimination; Arguments against condemning performance demands; Examination of the catch 22 described in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.
ACCESSION #
20374443

 

Related Articles

  • GENDER BIAS. Reske, Henry // ABA Journal;Nov88, Vol. 74 Issue 11, p38 

    Reports on the sex discrimination suits filed by plaintiff Ann Hopkins against Price Waterhouse in the U.S. Supreme Court. Evidence of a legitimate, nondiscriminatory and nonpretextual basis for Price Waterhouse's refusal to promote a Title VII plaintiff; Court of appeal's ruling that...

  • Woman in the Moon. Segal, Jonathan A. // HR Magazine;Aug2007, Vol. 52 Issue 8, p107 

    The article presents several court cases in the U.S., illustrating gender stereotypes in the workplace and Title VII legislation, whose mandate bars employers from acting on gender stereotypes. In the Supreme Court case Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, the Court agreed with the district court that...

  • TEACHING THE POST-SEX GENERATION. STONE, KERRI LYNN // St. Louis University Law Journal;Fall2013, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p223 

    The article discusses the anti-discrimination legislation and jurisprudence teaching by law professors of the law schools. Topics discussed include periphery of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employment discrimination litigation and the post-racialism and its discourse. Other...

  • THE BORGATA BABES CASE: THE WEIGHTY MATTER OF APPEARANCE STANDARDS. FREY, HOLLY C. // Widener Law Review;2015, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p95 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Superior Court of New Jersey in the case Schiavo v. Marina District Development Co. regarding reasonable workplace appearance, grooming and dress standards under the Title VII with the inferences of sex discrimination in the casino's personal appearance...

  • Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: Mixed Motive Discrimination Cases, the Shifting Burden of Proof, and Sexual Stereotyping. Cohen, Cynthia F. // Labor Law Journal;Nov89, Vol. 40 Issue 11, p723 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the "Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins" employment discrimination case. One of the most significant issues addressed by the Supreme Court in the case is the burden of proof in the mixed-motive discrimination. A mixed motive case involves...

  • labor law. Zachary, Mary-Kathryn // Supervision;Aug2004, Vol. 65 Issue 8, p22 

    Discusses several court cases on gender-based stereotyping in employment in the U.S. Price Waterhouse versus Hopkins; Nevada Department of Human Resources versus Hibbs; Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District.

  • SOUL OF A WOMAN: THE SEX STEREOTYPING PROHIBITION AT WORK. YURACKO, KIMBERLY A. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Feb2013, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p757 

    In 1989, the Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins declared that sex stereotyping was a prohibited form of sex discrimination at work. This seemingly simple declaration has been the most important development in sex discrimination jurisprudence since the passage of Title VII. It has been...

  • Tops, Bottoms, and Versatiles: What Straight Views of Penetrative Preferences Could Mean for Sexuality Claims Under Price Waterhouse. AYRES, IAN; LUEDEMAN, RICHARD // Yale Law Journal;Dec2013, Vol. 123 Issue 3, p714 

    This Essay reports the results of a survey experiment that we conducted on over eight hundred heterosexual respondents to compare associational attitudes toward gay men who engage in different types of sexual practices. Specifically, we randomly assigned respondents to hear one of three...

  • Clarifying Stereotyping. Stone, Kerri Lynn // Kansas Law Review;2011, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p591 

    The article focuses on stereotyping as a basis for, or as evidence of, liability in a workplace discrimination lawsuit. The author suggests that lower courts do not abide by a uniform standard when evaluating allegedly stereotypical statements, despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court case...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics