Court: No Decision on Price Rehearing

Albanese, Elizabeth
March 2006
Bond Buyer;3/28/2006, Vol. 355 Issue 32348, p32
Trade Publication
The article reports on the failure of the Supreme Court to announce whether it would rehear a class action lawsuit in which it tossed out a 10.1 billion dollars verdict against Philip Morris USA in Illinois. Saint Louis lawyer Stephen Tillery is asking for a rehearing of the case known as Price v. Philip Morris.


Related Articles

  • Significant Decision Redefines Class Certification in Massachusetts Deceptive Advertising Cases. Frederico, Donald R. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in the Aspinall v. Philip Morris Cos. Inc. case in 2004. The court ruled that merely purchasing a deceptively advertised product satisfy the element of injury for purposes of certifying a class under the Massachusetts...

  • Market fears a touch of class.  // Bulletin with Newsweek;3/21/95, Vol. 116 Issue 5962, p70 

    Reports on consumer class action against United States-based Philip Morris and its implication for Australian company Pacific Dunlop. Pacific Dunlop shareholders' concern over the effects of class action on the value of their shares; Devaluation of tobacco companies' stock price; Charges made...

  • Massachusetts' Top Court Allows Class Action Tobacco Suit. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/17/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31949, p4 

    Reports that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts approved the certification of a class action brought by smokers of light cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris USA. Contention of the plaintiffs that they were duped by misleading advertising to believe that smoking light cigarettes was...

  • Ruling in Price v. Philip Morris Appeal Expected Thursday in Illinois. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/14/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32278, p6 

    This article reports that a decision will be given by Illinois Supreme Court for the case in which Philip Morris USA Inc. is required to pay a $10.1 billion judgment to "light" cigarette smokers. Capitalists and financiers are awaiting the outcome of the case, because of its probable impact on...

  • Court Reverses Verdict Against Philip Morris. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/16/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32280, p1 

    The article reports that tobacco bond yields fell 15 basis points following a ruling yesterday by the Illinois Supreme Court which reversed a verdict from 2003 against Philip Morris USA. The decision reverses the original decision of Madison County Circuit Court Judge Nicholas Byron in Price vs....

  • Judge dismisses case against Philip Morris.  // National Petroleum News;Jun2002, Vol. 94 Issue 6, p14 

    Reports on the dismissal of lawsuit filed against Philip Morris U.S.A. Inc. by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and other tobacco producing companies concerning the retail-merchandising program of Philip Morris. Issuance of a ruling granting the respondent a motion for summary judgement; Decision of...

  • Judge questions light-cigarette smokers' bid for class action. Hays, Tom // Buffalo Law Journal;9/18/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 75, p18 

    The article reports that U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein has delayed his decision whether to grant class action status to a potential $200 billion lawsuit against tobacco companies Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Co. and other defendants, in September...

  • Court must draw a clear line on punitive damages award.  // Business Insurance;6/5/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 23, p8 

    The article comments on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Oregon punitive damages case Philip Morris versus Mayola Williams. It details the rulings of the Court on past punitive damages cases. It provides an overview of the case in question.

  • Don't Cry Over Spilt Coffee; Appeal Jury Award Instead! Walters, Bryan // Grand Rapids Business Journal;1/3/2006, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p18 

    The article examines the impact of large jury verdicts on businesses involved in high-publicity lawsuits in the U.S. The Illinois Supreme Court rejected the $10.1 billion verdict on a class action lawsuit involving cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris. The appellate court reduced the $3 million...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics