TITLE

11th Circuit Reiterates That Georgia's Total Statutory Ban on Sex Toys Advertising Violates The First Amendment

AUTHOR(S)
A. S. L.
PUB. DATE
April 2006
SOURCE
Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Apr2006, p62
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the violation of the First Amendment regarding the prohibition of sex toys advertising in Georgia. The legal prohibition on sex toys advertising was found to be unconstitutional. Thus, the board released a per curiam decision revoking and annulling Willis Hunt's denial to give summary judgment to the complainants. The conflict between Judge Hunt and the court avoids the constitutional question in order to grant advertising to the users of sex toys under the state law.
ACCESSION #
20362279

 

Related Articles

  • ALABAMA: Sex toy ban back in court again.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;8/25/2005, Issue 922, p30 

    Reports on the motion challenging a state law that bans the sale of sex toys in Alabama.

  • Plug Ugly. D’Entremont, Jim // Guide;Nov2006, Vol. 26 Issue 11, p73 

    The article discusses on the issue of banning sexual toys in Texas. Conservative Texan legislatures continue to upheld the proscription in which they contend that such stimulant could attribute to secondary effects such as prostitution, child molestation, and the spread of AIDS. In Texas, more...

  • Your Thong May Be in Danger. Torneo, Erin // Cosmopolitan;Sep2005, Vol. 239 Issue 3, p254 

    The article presents information on the legislations that emphasizes conservative agenda in the United States. Conservatives are using their legislative majorities to aggressively promote their agenda. Florida, Louisiana, and Virginia recently introduced public indecency bills that would fine...

  • SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS/PRIVACY--STAY CALM, DON'T GET HYSTERICAL: A USER'S GUIDE TO ARGUING THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-VIBRATOR STATUTES. McKenna, Julie // Western New England Law Review;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p211 

    The article discusses the legislation regarding the sales and distribution of sexual devices in Alabama. It informs that the Supreme Court of Alabama has discarded a statute which prohibits the use of sexual devices or any material that stimulates the human genital organs in the state. It...

  • LOCAL: Attack on Sex Toys In Arizona House.  // Advocate;3/20/80, Issue 288, p11 

    Reports that a bill introduced in the Arizona House of Representatives defines as obscene anything designed or marketed as useful primarily for sexual stimulation.

  • Women Protest Sex-Toy Ban In Alabama.  // Jet;03/08/99, Vol. 95 Issue 14, p39 

    Focuses on the challenging of the Alabama state law by Governor Fob James that bans the sale of vibrators and other sexual aids. Contention by women that it violates privacy rights; Representation of users and sellers of sex toys by Mark Lopez of the American Civil Liberties Union.

  • Georgia obscenity statute ruled unconstitutional.  // Contemporary Sexuality;May2006, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p16 

    The article reports that the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Georgia cannot ban the advertising of sex toys because it violates First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech. The store This, That and the Other Gift and Tobacco took the issue to court, arguing that the law...

  • bad vibes. Kushner, David // Mother Jones;May/Jun2006, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p18 

    The article reports on the fight of Sherri Williams, owner of romance boutique Pleasures in Alabama, against a 1998 state law that criminalizes the production and sale of any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs. Business has been good since...

  • MORALS LEGISLATION AFTER LAWRENCE: CAN STATES CRIMINALIZE THE SALE OF SEXUAL DEVICES? Possolo, Manuel // Stanford Law Review;Mar2013, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p565 

    In Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law criminalizing sexual relations between individuals of the same sex. The Court held that laws based on nothing more than moral disapproval lack a legitimate basis and are therefore unconstitutional. Despite the Court's strong...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics