TITLE

Content Protection Could Get a Boost

AUTHOR(S)
Rockwell, Mark
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
Wireless Week;3/15/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses issues concerning the ruling of the U.S. District Court in the Central District of California in February 2006 that prohibits Google to use pictures of nude female models found in the Web site of "Perfect 10" magazine. Claims on the image search function of Google; Number of images sold by Fonestarz Media; Legality of wireless content according to the court.
ACCESSION #
20292664

 

Related Articles

  • Judge Restricts Lawyers from Researching Jurors Online. Aveni, Carl A. // Litigation News;Fall2016, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p21 

    The article discusses ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in the case Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google, Inc. that the lawyers in a copyright suit may not research the public social media posts of their prospective jurors unless they fully disclose the extent of...

  • Montblanc Sues Google Over "Counterfeit" AdWords. R. B. // JCK;May2012, Vol. 143 Issue 5, p102 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by watch manufacturer Montblanc against Google Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which calls for the disclosure of the names of companies that are allegedly advertising counterfeits on Google's AdWorks program.

  • Google News takes hit in Belgian court ruling. Cendrowicz, Leo // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;9/19/2006, Vol. 396 Issue 10, p16 

    The article reports that a court in Belgium has ruled that Google Inc. has committed copyright infringement by reproducing articles from articles from French-language newspapers in the Belgian section of its Google News Web site. The company has also been ordered by the court to publish the...

  • Google Competitor Loses Rank. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Mar2003, Vol. 13 Issue 136, p74 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Search King Inc. against Google Technology Inc., a Mountain View, California-based search giant over the intentional devaluing of its page rank in Oklahoma. Merits of the case; Facts of the case; Contention of the plaintiff; Arguments of the defendant.

  • YouTube Should Start Playing By the Rules.  // Television Week;3/19/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p10 

    The author comments on Viacom's copyright suit against video-sharing site YouTube and its corporate parent Google. He claims that the suit is a negotiating ploy to extract a favorable licensing deal for material that ends on YouTube. It is also a sign notifying lawmakers that copyright law needs...

  • ORPHAN WORKS AT THE DAWN OF DIGITIZATION. Sullivan, Kelu L. // Richmond Journal of Law & Technology;2012, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p1 

    The article presents information on the principles of copyright protection associated with the orphan work problems in the U.S. It discusses the copyright infringement action in Authors Guild v. Google Inc., wherein the Southern District Court of New York has approved an amended settlement...

  • N.D. Cal. Decision Highlights Limitations in E-Discovery Cost Recovery. Row, Seth H. // Pretrial Practice & Discovery;Fall2012, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p41 

    The article discusses the court case Oracle Am. Inc. v. Google Inc. wherein the decision held by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in 2012 highlighted the limitations in electronic (e)-discovery cost recovery. It reports that the court denied the request of Google...

  • A Stronger Fair Use Doctrine? Pike, George H. // Information Today;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p15 

    The article considers the legal ramifications of the ruling of a U.S. federal court which held that Google did not violate the copyright to thumbnail images owned by Perfect 10, publisher of an adult magazine and Web site. The appellate court clearly recognized that linking to an image was not...

  • Copyright: Viacom's $1 Billion Claim Against YouTube. Mirchin, David // Information Today;May2007, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p1 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by media company Viacom against YouTube and its owner, Google, for alleged copyright infringement. Viacom claims damages in excess of $1 billion for infringing its more than 150,000 unauthorized clips of copyrighted programming owned by Viacom, which have...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics