Boston, Rob
February 2006
Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p10
The article focuses on the efforts of several parents to stop the teaching of intelligent design at the Frazier Mountain High School in California. The parents prevailed in their fight when the school's board of trustees decided to end the class and not offer it again. The course was engineered by Sharon Lemburg, a philosophy teacher. The parents claimed that the doctrine has nothing to do with philosophy.


Related Articles

  • Michigan, Gull Lake.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Aug2005, Vol. 25 Issue 3/4, p16 

    The article reports on the decision made by the Gull Lake Community Schools Board regarding the inappropriateness of intelligent design for biology classes in high school or for any classes at the middle school level, despite the reality that it is suitable for elective classes in political...

  • What They're Saying.  // Curriculum Review;Mar2006, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p3 

    The article presents views from public figures and personalities on issues related to education and curriculum. In a ruling by federal judge John E Jones III, he opines that while intelligent arguments may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, intelligent design is not...

  • The Manufacturing of Controversy: Debating Intelligent Design in Public. Whidden, Rachel Avon // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 2, p705 

    An essay is presented on the rhetorical approach of intelligent design (ID) theorists in the case of Ohio as it spread out in public documents, radio shows, polls, and newspapers. It defines a manufactured controversy as the one that legitimizes and necessitates the inclusion of alternatives in...

  • VICTORY IN DOVER! Boston, Rob // Church & State;Feb2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p4 

    The article discusses the decision of the court that declared the adoption of intelligent design in the curriculum in a public school as illegal in Dover, Pennsylvania. District Judge John E. Jones ruled that the program was unconstitutional because of its violation of the First Amendment's...

  • On ID in Public Schools.  // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Sep2008, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p183 

    The author asserts that the theological concept of Intelligent Design (ID) should not be taught in schools. The author believes that people who are advocating for ID have been reacting to some of the arguments, the rhetoric, and the political activism of secularists in the society. The author...

  • Keeping religion out of science class.  // Nature;8/11/2005, Vol. 436 Issue 7052, p753 

    Reports on the criticism of the science community on U.S. President George W. Bush's endorsement of intelligent design to schools. Concerns on the teachings of creationism in schools; Plan of the government to include intelligent design in school curriculum; Need for the country to improve its...

  • One Nation, Under... The Watchmaker?: Intelligent Design and the Establishment Clause. Schuneman, Nicholas A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p179 

    The article examines the constitutionality of teaching the Intelligent Design hypothesis in public schools in the U.S. The Intelligent Design hypothesis is primarily a response to and critique of the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was first elaborated by Charles Darwin. This...

  • Debating Design. Munro, Neil // National Journal;1/7/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p36 

    The article presents a debate over intelligent design versus the arguments for or against the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin. To undermine the authority of evolution, intelligent-design advocates publish what they say are scientific critiques of evolution, highlight what they call...

  • Ohio Education Board Reverses Course On Promoting 'Intelligent-Design' Creationism.  // Church & State;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on the decision of the Ohio Education Board to eliminate intelligent design from the state science standards. Americans United threatened to file a case against the removal of evolution instruction in schools. Other critics of intelligent design usage claimed that the lesson...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics