TITLE

Protected Statements

AUTHOR(S)
Melnitzer, Julius
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
InsideCounsel;Mar2006, Vol. 16 Issue 172, p36
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the decision made by the Ontario Court of Appeal on December 15, 2005 to lower the plaintiffs' bar for corporate disclosures by reversing the ruling by Superior Court Justice Sidney Lederman in the case Kerr v. Danier. Opportunity for purchasers of shares to claim damages under Section 130 of Ontario's Securities Act; Ruling by Lederman on damages to be paid by Danier Leather Inc. to investors; Requirements on corporate disclosure under the Securities Act. INSET: At a Glance: Bill 198.
ACCESSION #
20221745

 

Related Articles

  • LETTERS ROGATORY (EVIDENCE).  // International Law Update;Jul2006, Vol. 12, p129 

    The article reports on the upholding by the Ontario Court of Appeals on the decision penned by a New York federal court on the securities fraud class action filed by the Trustees of the Ontario Service Employees Union Pension Trust Fund against Nortel Networks Corp, a client of Deloitte and...

  • Credit Suisse Unit Settles an ARS Case.  // American Banker;11/30/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 213, p12 

    The article reports on a settlement which has been reached in 2009 between Credit Suisse Securities LLC and the securities division of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies. As a result of the settlement Credit Suisse Securities LLC has agreed to buy back $79.4 million in auction-rate...

  • Ontario Court of Appeal recognizes your right to sue for invasion of privacy. Wachowicz, Ian L. // Edmontonians;Mar2012, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p29 

    The article discusses a court case Jones vs. Tsige which deals with invasion of privacy. The Ontario Court of Appeal examined the case and reviewed the Canadian common law and statutes and Commonwealth jurisprudence. The court then discussed the causes, limitations and impact of these actions....

  • Canadian Appeals Court Upholds British Judgement.  // Corporate Legal Times;Dec2001, Vol. 11 Issue 121, pBWB10 

    Focuses on the decision of the Court of Appeals on the case of The Society of Lloyd's versus Meinzer in Ontario. Enforcement of the 1996 settlement of Lloyd's with its investors; Accounts on the previous ruling of the British Court; Details on the business losses suffered by Lloyd's.

  • Legality of stumpage fee decided by fall. Ross, Ian // Northern Ontario Business;Jul2008, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p28 

    The article reports that the decision of the legitimacy of the Residual Value Charge will be heard at the Ontario Court of Appeal on September 2, 2008 in Toronto. It states that on that date, the ongoing fight of Sault Ste. Marie hardwood mill operator Jim Boniferro to repeal a Crown stumpage...

  • EXTRADITION.  // International Law Update;Oct2007, Vol. 13, p194 

    The article reports on the lawsuit involving extradition. On appeal from judgments of extradition and surrender by Canada to the U.S. by one of the three individuals charged with operating fraudulent cross-border telemarketing scheme to the U.S. citizens, Ontario Court of Appeals dismisses...

  • Emails to different individuals can be used in whistleblowing cases.  // Employers Law;Mar2014, p5 

    The article reports on the case of Norbrook Laboratories (GB) Ltd. v. Shaw in which the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that communications to different individuals when taken together results to a qualifying disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA).

  • The fight for resolutions. Anand, Vineeta // Pensions & Investments;5/2/1994, Vol. 22 Issue 9, p30 

    Discusses alternative provisions of securities laws in the United States for disclosure of information in corporate proxy statements. Withholding of shareholder resolutions from investors; Right of refusal to publish proposals of a personal nature; Status of Securities and Exchange Commission...

  • DISCLOSURE. Ferrara, Donna // Risk Management (00355593);Apr2001, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p71 

    Focuses on the implications of and misconceptions about the United States Securities Exchange Commission's Fair Disclosure Rule governing disclosure of non-public information by companies regulated by federal securities law. Applicability to transactions undertaken in interstate commerce;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics