TITLE

Bees, Trees, Preemption, and Nuisance: A New Path to Resolving Pesticide Land Use Disputes

AUTHOR(S)
Klass, Alexandra B.
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2005, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p763
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This Article proposes a new framework for analyzing certain claims for pesticide damages. With the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bates v. Dow Agrosciences, plaintiffs in many pesticide cases can now bring a much larger range of state law claims to recover damages for fraud, improper testing, and other claims unrelated to pesticide labeling. This Article argues that by expressly allowing such state taw claims while reaffirming the importance of uniform labeling. Bates should encourage litigants and judges to rely more heavily on the label language in litigating negligence claims against pesticide users and to look more broadly to nuisance and trespass claims to obtain relief for pesticide use that complies with the label but nevertheless results in harm. Finally, this Article suggests greater emphasis be placed on new and existing state and federal statutes to obtain relief for pesticide related harm.
ACCESSION #
20084703

 

Related Articles

  • MORE THAN JUST PEANUTS. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Jan2005, Vol. 91 Issue 1, p16 

    Focuses on two U.S. Supreme Court cases to be held on trial in 2005. Bates v. Dow AgroSciences, which seeks claims for the damage of a Texas peanut farm from the use of the pesticide Strongarm manufactured by Dow; Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, which seeks action for the alleged deceit...

  • BATES et al. v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    This article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Bates et al v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, case number 03-388, argued on January 10, 2005 and decided on April 27, 2005. The District Court rejected one claim on state-law grounds and found the others barred by section 136v(b) of article 7...

  • Preemption in Products Liability Cases: An Analysis of Federal Product Preemption Under FIFRA and Bates v. Dow Agrosciences. Davis, William M.; Ryan, Elizabeth Haecker // Defense Counsel Journal;Apr2007, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p119 

    The article analyzes the federal preemption on product liability claims in the Bates v. Dow Agrosciences case decided on April 27, 2005. Farmers in Bates filed a case against Dow claiming that Strongarm herbicide stunted the growth of their peanut plants. Strongarm label states that it is safe...

  • Massachusetts High Court Refuses to Block Marriage Amendment; Convention Delays Voting. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Jul/Aug2006, p127 

    The article discusses on a decision by the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts in the case Schulman v. Attorney General. The court unanimously held that a proposed amendment to the state's constitution that would provide "the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall define marriage...

  • Court strips green status.  // Planning (14672073);11/26/2010, Issue 1896, p2 

    The article offers information on the decision of England's High Court on the green status of a 19 hectare-land in Weymouth, England.

  • Court Invalidates Oregon Takings Vote. Hogan, Dave // Planning;Dec2002, Vol. 68 Issue 12, p30 

    Reports on a constitutional amendment struck down by the Oregon Supreme Court. Impact of the measure on the land-use planning system; Compensation required for reduction in the value of real property; Fault found by the court in the measure.

  • SOME MODEL AMENDMENTS TO MAINE (AND OTHER STATES') LAND USE CONTROL LEGISLATION. Delogu, Orlando E.; Merrill, Sam; Saucier, Philip R. // Maine Law Review;2004, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p324 

    Discusses land use control legislation in Maine. Amendments; Provisions proposed; Ordinances.

  • Proposed amendments treat Constitution like a statute.  // American Bar Association Journal;Apr79, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p529 

    Comments on constitutional amendment activity in the U.S. Concerns regarding the treatment of the U.S. Constitution as a statute; Factors behind the ease of amendment of the Constitution; Policy implications on the legal system.

  • Weekly Statutory Instruments.  // EPM Weekly Bulletin;12/6/2004, Issue 197, p33 

    This article lists all statutory instruments (SIs) dealing with education from all parts of Great Britain issued during November 29 to December 3, 2004. Some statutory instruments covering Ulster are issued in London while others are issued in Northern Ireland. The SI "The Education (Listed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics