TITLE

Evolution and Creationism in Science: 1880-2000

AUTHOR(S)

Bleckmann, Charles A.

PUB. DATE

February 2006

SOURCE

BioScience;Feb2006, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p151

SOURCE TYPE

Academic Journal

DOC. TYPE

Article

ABSTRACT

The journal Science has documented the evolutionist-creationist controversy since it began publication in 1880. The annual number of references suggests the intensity of the public debate. Peaks occurred in response to the Scopes trial (1925) and trials in California (1979-1981), Arkansas (1981), and Louisiana (1982-1987). Although evolutionists won the last three outright, and public opinion largely supported science in the Scopes trial, dissenting opinions in the Supreme Court in the most recent case seem to have given impetus to new creationist activity--the intelligent design movement. Arguments have changed only slightly in the last century and a quarter. Fundamentalist opposition to teaching evolution remains strong Scientists have consistently suggested better education as the solution to the dispute; however, to date, evidence does not support that position. Differences between science and fundamentalism appear irreconcilable, and no obvious end to the acrimonious debate is in sight.

ACCESSION #

20029374

Tags: EVOLUTION (Biology);  CREATIONISM;  SCIENTIFIC literature;  RELIGIOUS fundamentalism;  INTELLIGENT design (Teleology);  NATURAL selection

 

Related Articles

• "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

  The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

• For Devolution.  // National Review;8/29/2005, Vol. 57 Issue 15, p13 

  Focuses on the debate over teaching intelligent design or evolution in U.S. public schools. The rationale for not accepting natural selection as the only explanation for the development of human beings; The role of the Supreme Court in making evolution a national issue; Suggestion that local...

• Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism? Lerner, Lawrence S. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18 

  The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts...

• How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

  In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

• Evolution. Acomb, Deborah L. // National Journal;7/16/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 29, p2320 

  Reports on the results of two surveys conducted by Harris Interactive and "Newsweek" magazine regarding creationism and human evolution in the U.S. as of July 16, 2005. Fraction of the respondents who believed that human beings were created directly by God; Percentage of respondents who...

• EDITORIAL.  // Australasian Science;Jul2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

  The author comments on the advocacy of Doctor John Ashton of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI) of intelligent design (ID). Ashton received harsh criticism from the scientific community due to his support of ID. Tas Wager of the of Creation of Ministries International accuses...

• Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths. Numbers, Ronald L. // History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p129 

  The essay seeks to explain creationism and subvert five myths the author has identified concerning the subject and creationists. He first denies that creationists believe in the fixity of species and the perfect design of the world. He distinguishes between young-earth creationists and...

• Scientists and Literalists. Born, Daniel // Common Review;Spring2006, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p4 

  This article comments on the debate between evolutionary theorists and creationists over the narrative of Genesis 1 and 2. It reports on a federal judge's ruling that prohibited the proponents of intelligent design in the Dover, Pennsylvania school district to present their viewpoint in biology...

• The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

  Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...

Read the Article