TITLE

Executive Compensation and Incentives

AUTHOR(S)
Conyon, Martin J.
PUB. DATE
February 2006
SOURCE
Academy of Management Perspectives;Feb2006, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p25
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The objective of a properly designed executive compensation package is to attract, retain, and motivate CEOs and senior management. The standard economic approach for understanding executive pay is the principal-agent model. This paper documents the changes in executive pay and incentives in U.S. firms between 1993 and 2003. We consider reasons for these transformations, including agency theory, changes in the managerial labor markets, shifts in firm strategy, and theories concerning managerial power. We show that boards and compensation committees have become more independent over time. In addition, we demonstrate that compensation committees containing affiliated directors do not set greater pay or fewer incentives.
ACCESSION #
19873408

 

Related Articles

  • Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and Symbolism. Zajac, Edward J.; Westphal, James D. // Administrative Science Quarterly;Jun95, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p283 

    While current debates about CEO compensation have generally been dominated by economic and political perspectives on CEO/board relations, we argue in this paper that CEO compensation may be driven by symbolic as well as substantive considerations. We develop an interdisciplinary theoretical...

  • Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management. Westphal, James D. // Administrative Science Quarterly;Sep98, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p511 

    This paper presents a model that incorporates the behavior of chief executive officers (CEOs) into an explanation of how boards of directors affect organizational out-comes. Hypotheses are tested with archival data on corporate strategy, CEO compensation, board structure, and demographics,...

  • Economic and psychological perspectives on CEO compensation: a review and synthesis. O’Reilly, Charles A.; Main, Brian G. M. // Industrial & Corporate Change;Jun2010, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p675 

    To many, the principal–agent model is the obvious lens through which executive pay should be viewed. Such a sentiment sits uncomfortably with a large number of empirical studies suggesting that the process of determining executive pay seems to be more readily explained by recourse to...

  • Price versus Non-Price Performance Measures in Optimal CEO Compensation Contracts. Core, John E.; Guay, Wayne R.; Verrecchia, Robert E. // Accounting Review;Oct2003, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p957 

    We empirically examine standard agency predictions about how performance measures are optimally weighted to provide CEO incentives. Consistent with prior empirical research, we document that the relative weight on price and non-price performance measures in CEO cash pay is a decreasing function...

  • EXECUTIVE JOB DEMANDS: NEW INSIGHTS FOR EXPLAINING STRATEGIC DECISIONS AND LEADER BEHAVIORS. Hambrick, Donald C.; Finkelstein, Sydney; Mooney, Ann C. // Academy of Management Review;Jul2005, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p472 

    Executive jobs vary widely in the difficulty they pose for their incumbents, yet research on top executives and strategic decision making has largely ignored this reality. We build on work in industrial/organizational psychology to develop the construct of executive job demands; discuss its...

  • Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence. Cyert, Richard M.; Sok-Hyon Kang; Kumar, Praveen // Management Science;Apr2002, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p453 

    We examine, both theoretically and empirically, top-management compensation in the presence of agency conflicts when shareholders have delegated governance responsibilities to a self-interested Board of Directors (BOD). We develop a theoretical framework that explicitly incorporates the BOD as a...

  • THE DYNAMICS OF THE CEO-BOARD RELATIONSHIP: AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE. Shen, Wei // Academy of Management Review;Jul2003, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p466 

    This note addresses both CEO leadership development and the control of managerial opportunism in the CEO-board relationship through an evolutionary perspective. Based on the analysis of the evolution of CEOs' leadership and power, I propose that boards need to focus on CEO leadership development...

  • Employee Engagement. Woodruffe, Charles // Manager: British Journal of Administrative Management;Dec2005/Jan2006, Issue 50, p28 

    This article presents suggestion on employee motivation. Chief executives of most organisations rarely miss an opportunity to remind their audience and themselves that their people are their most precious asset. Certainly, in the highly sophisticated economies in which organisations operate...

  • CEO Compensation in Canada, 1971-2008. Gélinas1, Patrice; Baillargeon, Lisa // International Journal of Business & Management;Jun2013, Vol. 8 Issue 12, p1 

    This paper draws from a unique database spanning over 35 years of Canadian CEOs' compensation to explore the interplay among: the information available to boards of directors of Canadian companies for making executive pay decisions, the Canadian business environment, and the compensation that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics