TITLE

What's the Buzz

AUTHOR(S)
Linn, Laura
PUB. DATE
March 2006
SOURCE
Scholastic Scope;3/6/2006, Vol. 54 Issue 13, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a debate on whether the machine "The Mosquito," that emits a high-frequency pulsing sound and keeps teenagers from hanging out at public places should be used.
ACCESSION #
19826917

 

Related Articles

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

  • Evaluating student learning with mock debates. Nicaise, Molly; Brown, Jennifer // Contemporary Education;1997, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p131 

    Analyzes the role of mock debates in student learning evaluation. Benefits of mock debates; Improvement of communication skills, application skills and general knowledge; Description and purpose of mock debates; Determination of student understanding; Stress on the issues of cost and time;...

  • Great debate! Butz, Carol S. // Reading Teacher;Apr95, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p618 

    Relates the experience of the author in conducting a debate in the classroom. Ground rules for debate; Details of the debate session.

  • Dumbed down debates. Myers, Dennis // Las Vegas Business Press;07/13/98, Vol. 15 Issue 28, p4 

    Opinion. Discusses the role of content-rich debates in politics. Reinforcement of all the flaws in the election process; Reempowerment of debates if the candidates could be denied control of the formats and panelists; Principal level at which debates really work at informing the public.

  • Candidates to debate in San Marcos. Murdock, Pat // Hays Free Press (Buda, TX);10/8/2008, Vol. 105 Issue 27, p1C 

    The announces the public invitation for the San Marcos Area League of Women Voters Candidates Debate in San Marcos, Texas.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics