TITLE

Construction Week

PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
ENR: Engineering News-Record;1/30/2006, Vol. 256 Issue 4, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents news brief related to the construction industry. A Missouri court is slated to decide whether a 315-MW powerplant completed in 2005 must be torn down. Utility company Aquila Inc., Kansas City, built the $140-million, three-unit, gas-turbine peaking plant in eight months near the city of Peculiar in Cass County, Missouri. A Georgia state court has dismissed a lawsuit by students and engineering professors protesting a decision by Clark Atlanta University to shut down its engineering department by 2008 for financial reasons.
ACCESSION #
19725752

 

Related Articles

  • Rights and remedies.  // Contract Journal;9/24/2008, Vol. 444 Issue 6692, p37 

    The article offers information on the lawsuit VGC Construction vs. Jackson Civil Engineering on issue of construction contracts in Great Britain. It mentions that VGC was engaged by Jackson as its subcontractor for the provision of ducts and cabling on the M3 motorway. The company experienced...

  • Sprunt Ltd v London Borough of Camden.  // EG: Estates Gazette;3/3/2012, Issue 1209, p152 

    The article discusses the court case Sprunt Ltd. v. London Borough of Camden. The case focused on construction, the appointment of adjudicator and the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. The court ruled that the construction contract relating to phase B was in writing and is...

  • Court in the Middle.  // National Review;2/24/1989, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p14 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Richmond, Virginia's Ordinance No. 83-69-59 that set aside 30 per cent of all city construction contracts for firms meeting certain minority standards. The essential problem is that the Supreme Court continues to search...

  • CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT--VACATING AWARD--GROUNDS--CALIFORNIA.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep1966, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p190 

    The article presents information about a court case decision regarding a construction contract in California. According to the court, parties to the construction contract who subsequently executed valid arbitration agreement are bound by the decision of the arbiter unless set aside in accordance...

  • Something to Lien On... Grossbart, Kenneth S. // Reeves Journal: Plumbing, Heating, Cooling;Jul2013, Vol. 93 Issue 7, p8 

    The article considers the case of Appel vs. Superior Court of Los Angeles County which dealt with the valuation of a mechanic's lien on a condominium project. Wilshire Landmark was the developer and Webcor Construction was the contractor which performed work to the property under a construction...

  • More than Just Paperwork.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;11/23/1998, Vol. 241 Issue 20, p140 

    Focuses on a lawsuit filed by engineer Ed Turner regarding an alleged improper engineering stamping of construction firms in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Dismissal of a motion for decision reconsideration by Turner; Account on the affidavit opposing a motion for summary judgment; Impact of the lawsuit...

  • AWARD--DAMAGES--DISCRETION OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISER--NOT REVIEWABLE--MISTAKES SUBJECT (AND NOT SUBJECT) TO COURT CODIFICATION--WISCONSIN.  // Arbitration Journal;Mar1966, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p62 

    This article focuses on a court decision in the case Reith V. Wynhoff, according to which where parties submitted building contract to court-appointed real estate appraiser and contractor, and stipulation did not restrict the real estate appraiser in his judgment or method of arriving at damages...

  • CONSTRUCTION -- CONDITION PRECEDENT -- TIMELINESS -- DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep76, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p216 

    The article focuses on the decision given by a U.S. court in the lawsuit Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Perfetto & Whaten Construction Corp., in the year 1976. The court held that where a construction contract clearly required that written decision by project architect resolving contract disputes...

  • COMMERCIAL -- SPORTS -- AGENCY FEES -- FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT -- ARBITRATOR DISQUALIFICATION -- NEW YORK.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun88, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p67 

    The article presents information on a court decision related to construction contract. The district court properly sustained an arbitrator's decision without hearing additional testimony because the arbitrator did not err in refusing to consider evidence of an alleged offer of payment. Hex Corp...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics