Meilaender, Gilbert
April 2005
Studies in Christian Ethics;2005, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p75
Academic Journal
The author suggests that Christian participation in public policy deliberations about bioethical issues may be helped by structures which do not require the search for consensus (or, in particular, the kind of ‘overlapping consensus’ favoured by Rawlsians) on policy. This argument is made, first, by a general discussion of the place of religious visions within public discourse and, second, by an examination of the structure and some of the reports of the President's Council on Bioethics (USA).


Related Articles

  • Holding Cell. Groopman, Jerome // New Republic;8/5/2002, Vol. 227 Issue 6/7, p14 

    Criticizes the four-year moratorium proposed by the Council on Bioethics of the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush in 2002. Implication of the decision for scientists and patients with incurable diseases; Information on the process of reproductive and therapeutic cloning;...

  • Theologians say clones would have souls.  // National Catholic Reporter;12/21/2001, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p9 

    Reports on the statement of several theologians specializing in bioethical concerning the spiritual aspects human cloning. Production of human beings with souls; Changes in the church teaching; Impact of biological developments on religious aspects in man's life.

  • It's cloning again! Biller-Andorno, Nikola // Journal of Medical Ethics;Feb2005, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p63 

    Discusses the issue of human cloning. Countries which limited their proposal to reproductive cloning; Main arguments regarding human cloning; Lessons to be learned in creating a universal bioethical standard.

  • Limited cloning ban disappoints prolife groups. Guthrie, Stan // Christianity Today;9/9/2002, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p17 

    Highlights the recommendation of the President's Council on Bioethics to completely ban human cloning for reproduction in the U.S. Argument of Family Research Council on human cloning; Number of members appointed by President George W. Bush to the advisory panel.

  • Cloning Me, Cloning You: Reflections on the Ethics of Cloning for Individuals, Families and Society. Magney, Alix // Social Alternatives;2003 First Quarter, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p19 

    This article focuses on the ethics of cloning a human being for the purposes of producing a child or children in a family. The paper begins with a layperson's understanding of the science of cloning, before addressing common myths that are associated with the technology. Then there is a brief...

  • Expert Group on Human Rights and Biotechnology Convened by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Conclusions on Human Reproductive Cloning. Brahmachari, S. K.; Kirby, Michael; Knoppers, Bartha Maria; Marks, Stephen P.; Questiaux, Mme Nicole; Tarantola, Daniel; Huanming Yang // Health & Human Rights: An International Journal;2002, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p153 

    The article discusses the conclusions of a meeting held by an expert group on human rights and biotechnology concerning human reproductive cloning in Geneva, Switzerland in January 2002. The experts discussed the complex relationship between ethical and human rights approaches, both of which...

  • Cloning defamed by the search for human eggs.  // Reproductive BioMedicine Online (Reproductive Healthcare Limited;Jan2006, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p126 

    Considers the bioethical implication of reports that Korean human cloning scientist Woo Suk Hwang has confessed he obtained human eggs from members of his junior staff and from paid donors. Response of the Korean government to the reports; Criticism against move to apply patents on Hwang's...

  • US panel split on research cloning. Powell, Kendall // Nature;7/18/2002, Vol. 418 Issue 6895, p264 

    Reports on the split decision issued by the bioethics council of U.S. President George W. Bush on whether to ban cloning for research purposes. Overview of a report on human cloning issued in July 2002; Information on the legislative body responsible for laws regarding ban of cloning;...

  • Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent. Herissone-Kelly, P. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Mar2006, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p166 

    Julian Savulescu has given clear expression to a principle--that of "procreative beneficence"--which underlies the thought of many contemporary writers on bioethics. The principle of procreative beneficence (PPB) holds that parents or single reproducers are at least prima facie obliged to select...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics