TITLE

Delayed Rezoning Not a Taking, Court Says

AUTHOR(S)
Lawlor, James
PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
Planning;Jan2006, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled in the Byrd versus City of Hartsville that to rezone a landowner's property does not constitute a compensable regulatory taking. Phelix Byrd, who owns a land parcel that lies partly within Hartsville and partly within adjoining Darlington County, decided to subdivide and sell his property to developers. But the buyer demanded that the land parcel should be rezoned commercial. Therefore, Byrd filed a rezoning petition, but the city council repeatedly deferred action on it because permitting commercial development on any of the former Coker Farms property would lead the National Park Service to withdraw the designation. Byrd sued the city and county and claimed that the rezoning delay was a regulatory taking and that the city and the county had engaged in a conspiracy to block the issuance of deeds. Therefore, he appealed the takings ruling. According to the court, because he had suffered a temporary economic loss but he was still able to continue farming it.
ACCESSION #
19691215

 

Related Articles

  • Viability comes to fore in site acquisition decisions. Ricketts, Simon // Planning (14672073);9/19/2008, Issue 1787, p11 

    The analyzes the decision of the court over various legal disputes focusing on the validity of the compulsory purchase orders (CPOs) under section 226(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 in Great Britain. It is remarkable that the government refused to accept arguments that the...

  • Validity of Large-Lot Zoning Turns on Degree of Urbanization. Lawyor, James // Planning;Jan2006, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p41 

    The article reports that as a population growth control measure, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division endorsed the use of Iarge-lot zoning. East Brunswick Township, which attracts a crowd of 46.756 people everyday is rapidly developing bedroom community between Newark and Trenton....

  • Controversial St. Louis Sign Case Lands In Federal Court. Prost, Charlene // Planning;Feb2008, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p54 

    The article reports that a colorful anti-eminent domain sign crafted by Jim Roos on a redbrick apartment building in downtown St. Louis, Missouri, is now before the federal court of Eastern District of Missouri. Roos, known as the president of the Missouri Eminent Domain Abuse Coalition and a...

  • Court clarifies 'hardship' in new variance ruling. Eills, Andrew B. // New Hampshire Business Review;6/25/2004, Vol. 26 Issue 13, p1B 

    Focuses on the clarifications provided by the courts to the issue of use variances as opposed to area variances under the zoning law in New Hampshire. Provisions of the nation's zoning laws; Court cases that demonstrated the difference between use variances and area variances; Standard for...

  • Arizona Eminent Domain Bill Could Block the Path of Bond-Backed Redevelopment. Williamson, Richard // Bond Buyer;4/15/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31615, p6 

    Proposed Arizona legislation that would limit the use of eminent domain to acquire property for public redevelopment could also hinder bond-financed projects. Under House Bill 2308, cities could not use eminent domain to condemn property until 854570360f the area to be redeveloped had fallen...

  • "I'm Smarter than Everyone Else". Foulkes, Arthur E. // Freeman: Ideas on Liberty;Jun2012, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p18 

    The article discusses essential role of private property rights to a free and progressive society. It reveals that zoning regulations put restrictions on private property rights are established to protect other property owners from undue harm. It notes that zoning laws can also be tools for...

  • It's all to do with standing. Edwards, Martin; Martin, John // EG: Estates Gazette;11/13/2004, Issue 446, p148 

    Looks at the position regarding challenges to decisions of the British Secretary of State in respect of the determination of a planning application called in under Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Information on the case Morbaine Ltd versus First Secretary of State...

  • SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIMS IN THE LAND-USE CONTEXT: THE NEED FOR A SIMPLE AND INTELLIGENT STANDARD OF REVIEW. Mehrbani, Parna A. // Environmental Law (00462276);Winter2005, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p209 

    When a municipal government denies a landowner's permit or zoning application, the landowner does not have a legitimate ‘takings’ claim if the land is still economically viable. In this situation, an aggrieved landowner can bring a federal claim for violation of substantive due...

  • Court Voids Zoning Changes Because Public Notice Is Inadequate. Lawlor, James // Planning;Feb2004, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p49 

    Presents information on a court ruling that zoning changes can be challenged on the basis of inadequate public notices. Lack of adequate information of hearings in newspaper notices; Reports of landowners going to court; Need for having a descriptive summary of the proposed action; Definition...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics