Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP®) publications

Oakley, Paul A.; Harrison, Donald D.; Harrison, Deed E.; Haas, Jason W.
December 2005
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association;Dec2005, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p270
Academic Journal
BACKGROUND: Although practice protocols exist for SMT and functional rehabilitation, no practice protocols exist for structural rehabilitation. Traditional chiropractic practice guidelines have been limited to acute and chronic pain treatment, with limited inclusion of functional and exclusion of structural rehabilitation procedures. OBJECTIVE: (1) To derive an evidence-based practice protocol for structural rehabilitation from publications on Clinical Biomechanics of Posture (CBP®) methods, and (2) to compare the evidence for Diversified, SMT, and CBP®. METHODS: Clinical control trials utilizing CBP® methods and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) were obtained from searches in Mantis, CINAHL, and Index Medicus. Using data from SMT review articles, evidence for Diversified Technique (as taught in chiropractic colleges), SMT, and CBP® were rated and compared. RESULTS: From the evidence from Clinical Control Trials on SMT and CBP®, there is very little evidence support for Diversified (our rating = 18), as taught in chiropractic colleges, for the treatment of pain subjects, while CBP® (our rating = 46) and SMT for neck pain (rating = 58) and low back pain (our rating = 202) have evidence-based support. CONCLUSIONS: While CBP® Technique has approximately as much evidence-based support as SMT for neck pain, CBP® has more evidence to support its methods than the Diversified technique taught in chiropractic colleges, but not as much as SMT for low back pain. The evolution of chiropractic specialization has occurred, and doctors providing structural-based chiropractic care require protocol guidelines for patient quality assurance and standardization. A structural rehabilitation protocol was developed based on evidence from CBP® publications.


Related Articles

  • The Crossroads of Rehab and Technique. Payne, Mark R. // American Chiropractor;Dec2008, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p46 

    The article discusses the difference between adjusting technique and spinal rehabilitation in chiropractic. In chiropractic, this technique would be classed as passive care in that the patient is a nonactive recipient of care administered by the doctor while rehabilitation has been defined as...

  • Dueling Paradigms: Why every chiropractor should embrace postural rehabilitation concepts. Payne, Mark // American Chiropractor;Jan2008, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p48 

    The article discusses the changes embraced by chiropractors in dealing with postural rehabilitation in the U.S. The new paradigm in chiropractic emphasizes the importance of restoring normal spinal motion as opposed to traditional concepts of correcting abnormal spinal structure. On the other...

  • The appropriate use of radiography in clinical practice: a report of two cases of biomechanical versus malignant spine pa. Pringle, Roger Kevin; Wyatt, Lawrence H. // Chiropractic & Osteopathy;2006, Vol. 14, p8 

    Background: To describe the evaluation, treatment, management and referral of two patients with back pain with an eventual malignant etiology, who were first thought to have a non-organic biomechanical disorder. Clinical features: The study was a retrospective review of the clinical course of...

  • Strengthening the Core From the Inside Out. Konen, Jeff G.; Peterson, Connie L. // Athletic Therapy Today;Jul2003, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p41 

    Describes the spinal stabilization exercises in both injury-prevention and rehabilitation programs in the U.S. Factors contributing to lumbar pain syndromes; Cause of the delay of the activation of the transverse abdominis; Provision of ideal stabilization for the lumbar spine.

  • The Active Care Continuum. Morgan, William // ACA News (American Chiropractic Association);Oct2009, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p20 

    The article presents the author's insights on the importance of physical therapy in the progression of passive care to active health care of patients with spinal injuries. It states that chiropractic adjustment works well with active care which can improve the levels of activity of patients. It...

  • Back to Business.  // Joe Weider's Muscle & Fitness;Oct99, Vol. 60 Issue 10, p30 

    Provides information on the efforts of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) to alert the public on the benefits of a healthy spinal column. Importance of the prevention of spinal problems.

  • REVIEW OF GOAL SETTING ON A SPINAL INJURY UNIT. Liebelt, Beverley // Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses' Association (;2007 Autumn Edition, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p10 

    ‘Goal-setting is widely considered a fundamental component of modern approaches to clinical rehabilitation’ (Siegert et al, 2004, p.1176). Formalised goal setting was introduced to the Spinal Injury Unit at Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, Adelaide, South Australia after the...

  • Effects of one-point and four-point canes on balance and weight distribution in patients with hemiparesis. Laufer, Yocheved // Clinical Rehabilitation;Mar2002, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p141 

    Objective: To examine the effects of one-point and four-point canes on postural sway and on the distribution of weight between the lower extremities and the walking aids in hemiparetic patients. Setting: Flieman Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Haifa, Israel. Subjects: Thirty hemiparetic...

  • If you live in pain you cannot afford to skip this article Unless you like the way you feel.  // St. Charles Journal;3/13/2013, Vol. 48 Issue 11, pA6 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience living in pain due to spine problems which requires a chiropractic therapy for pain management.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics