Delahunty, Robert J.; Yoo, John
September 2005
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2005, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p291
Academic Journal
The article looks at the practice of several U.S. Supreme Court justices who have considered the decisions of foreign and international courts for guidance in interpreting the U.S. constitution. This practice has occurred in several controversial, high profile cases. There are two main reasons to think that use of foreign or international decisions extends beyond mere ornamentation.


Related Articles

  • Defendant Not Entitled to Preliminary Injunction Halting Its Withdrawal Liability Payments.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p65 

    The article reports that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana has concluded that a company challenging a 1.2 million dollars withdrawal liability assessment by a multiemployer pension fund was not entitled to a preliminary injunction halting. The court balances the harm...

  • Comment on Cases.  // California Law Review;Jan1927, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p153 

    Presents several U.S. court decisions as of January 1927. Illustration of the conditional delivery to the grantee, in Kimbro v. Kimbro; Case on the constitutional law for imprisonment for debt; Principle in the law of trusts regarding the consideration for land.

  • A Review of Recent Cases in the Courts for the Quarter Ending December, 1919. McMurray, Orrin K. // California Law Review;Jan1920, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p95 

    Presents information on several U.S. court decisions as of January 1920. Case of Abrams v. United States, in the field of constitutional law; Cases involving the Workmen's Compensation Act; Disqualification of judges in Favorite v. Superior Court.

  • THE NEW SENTENCING CONUNDRUM: POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AT CROSS-PURPOSES. Reitz, Kevin R. // Columbia Law Review;May2005, Vol. 105 Issue 4, p1082 

    For most of American legal history, federal constitutional law has had little to say about the processes or substantive results of criminal punishment decisions. This constitutional abdication has led to a robust era of experimentation in sentencing systems, with no meaningful constitutional...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions.  // California Law Review;Oct62, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p718 

    Presents an update on court decisions in the U.S. as of October 1962. Decision in United States v. Wood, on federal court injunctions against state criminal proceedings; Details on People v. Ditson, regarding the exclusion of evidence found as a result of a coerced confession; Judgment in...

  • A Choice of Law Approach for International Antisuit Injunctions†. Kerwin, Jody W. // Texas Law Review;Feb2003, Vol. 81 Issue 3, p928 

    Argues that all common-law courts should first carry out a choice of law analysis to decide which equitable principles govern the grant or denial of an international antisuit injunction in order to promote international comity. Doctrines employed by the U.S. and Great Britain courts when...

  • AVOIDING ADVERSARIAL ADJUDICATION. MORLEY, MICHAEL T. // Florida State University Law Review;Winter2014, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p291 

    There are a variety of procedural vehicles through which litigants may seek a substantive court ruling or order that declares or modifies their legal rights and obligations without actually litigating the merits of a case as a whole or particular issues within the case. These alternatives...

  • Lower Court Holding.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2005, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p6 

    Discusses the decision of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a case on who the "dormant" Commerce Clause and the Twenty-First Amendment interact to limit the ways in which a Stat can control alcohol sales and distribution. Precedent in the "Bacchus Imports v. Dias" case; Rejection of the...

  • Appeals Court Again Rejects COPA.  // American Libraries;Apr2003, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p15 

    For the second time, a United States federal appeals court in Philadelphia has found the Child Online Protection Act, which requires commercial Web sites to obtain proof of age before delivering material considered harmful to minors, to be unconstitutional. A three-judge panel of the Third U.S....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics