Wait-time benchmarks fall short

Comeau, Pauline
January 2006
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;1/31/2006, Vol. 174 Issue 3, p299
Academic Journal
This article reports on the limitations of the new wait-time benchmarks announced by the Canadian federal government on December 12, 2005. This announcement fulfils the commitment to establish evidence-based wait-time benchmarks in 5 areas of care that was made in the September 2004 federal/provincial health accord.


Related Articles

  • Solucient 100 Top Hospitals.  // Health Management Technology;May2007, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p10 

    The article offers information on the annual Solucient 100 Top Hospitals National Benchmarks for Success study which revealed that more than half of the winning hospitals are in the Midwest with 30 of them based in Michigan and Ohio. The study looked at clinical outcomes, efficiency, patient...

  • Benchmarking Standards of Care. O'Leary, Jeannie // Journal of Oncology Management;Summer2005, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p62 

    Discusses key issues concerning benchmarking initiatives by the Commission on Cancer to improve standards of medical care in cancer-treatment programs in the U.S. Impact of the benchmarking initiatives on efforts to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality; Accreditation of anti-cancer programs;...

  • Benchmarking: a useful tool for informing and improving care of the dying? John Ellershaw; Maureen Gambles; Tamsin McGlinchey // Supportive Care in Cancer;Jul2008, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p813 

    Abstract Objective  The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of participating in two benchmarking exercises to assess the care delivered to patients in the dying phase using the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Design  The study uses questionnaire...

  • Understanding and benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals for chronic disease. Bell, Erica; Seidel, Bastian // BMC Health Services Research;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p343 

    Background: Key challenges in benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals in areas such as chronic disease are: 1) developing indicators and understanding how policy goals might work as indicators of service performance; 2) developing methods for economically collecting and reporting...

  • Benchmarking For Better Outcomes. Schwartz, Kove // Podiatry Management;Sep2005, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p141 

    Stresses the importance of benchmarking in podiatric practice. History of benchmarking in podiatry; Benefits of benchmarking quality of care indicators; Comparison between external and internal benchmarking; Guidelines for implementing corrective measures after benchmarking

  • Strategisches Benchmarking. Bredl, K.; Hüsig, S.; Angele, M.K.; Lüring, C. // Der Orthopäde;Aug2010, Vol. 39 Issue 8, p785 

    Current changes in the health system due to economic restrictions leading to increased competition require the introduction of intelligent management tools in the clinical arena. In a world where change and development are the only constants, flexibility and critical judgment of one’s own...

  • Does This Benchmark? Opsahl, Andy // Government Technology;Feb2006, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p23 

    Deals with the adoption of benchmarking by state and federal agencies in the U.S. Problem with the comparison of government agencies with public sector organizations in terms of efficiency; Contract of state governments with the National Association of State Auditors, Comptrollers and...

  • Six Blind Men and the Elephant. Wang, Binseng // 24x7;Oct2009, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p46 

    The article focuses on the lack of understanding on benchmarking by clinical engineering (CE) professionals and health care executives. It cites the ancient Hindu parable about the six blind men and the elephant. Also discussed is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), a performance management method...

  • What if physicians don't believe your quality data?  // Healthcare Benchmarks & Quality Improvement;Jul2008, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p67 

    The article discusses the importance of convincing physicians of the validity of healthcare quality data. The author argues that physicians will be encouraged to improve the quality of their service if they believe in the validity of quality data furnished by hospitals. The use of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics