TITLE

Lost in the Shuffle: The Failure of the Pan-Asian Coalition to Advance the Interests of Southeast Asian Americans

AUTHOR(S)
Taing, Susan
PUB. DATE
March 2005
SOURCE
Berkeley La Raza Law Journal;Spring2005, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p23
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the rulings of the Supreme Court regarding the case "Grutter v. Bollinger," upholding the University of Michigan's favoring actions policies toward Latin Americans, African Americans and Native Americans. The court held the law school's desire to boost a diverse student body. However, Grutter argued whether Asian Americans were offended by the Law School's admission policy.
ACCESSION #
19477673

 

Related Articles

  • Not Out of the Woods Yet. Collier Sr., Willyerd R. // Black Issues in Higher Education;7/17/2003, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p42 

    Examines a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Grutter versus Bollinger, which deals with race-sensitive affirmative action programs. Laws and facts disputed in the case; Constraints that affect higher educational institutions.

  • The Destruction of the Holistic Approach to Admissions: The Pernicious Effects of Rankings. Johnson Jr., Alex M. // Indiana Law Journal;Winter2006, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p309 

    This article considers an holistic approach in evaluating candidates for law school admissions required by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. A summary of Grutter is offered. The history and use of the LSAT is also summarized. The pernicious effect of the law school...

  • Litigators and Communities Working Together: Grutter v. Bollinger and the New Civil Rights Movement. Massie, Miranda // Berkeley Women's Law Journal;2004, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p318 

    Presents an article on the use of litigation as part of a larger organizing strategy and on how it relates to the litigation strategy and experience in the Grutter v. Bollinger case in the U.S. Reasons that motivated the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action and Integration and Fight for...

  • Scrutinizing Diversity: Challenging the Premises of Affirmative Action. Bennett, John // Academic Questions;Jun2015, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p207 

    The article discusses the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case Grutter v. Bollinger which notes that schools may make narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in acquiring the educational benefits from a diverse student body. It says that this...

  • Achieving Diversity on Campus: A Better Approach. Munce, Don // Diverse: Issues in Higher Education;12/29/2005, Vol. 22 Issue 23, p43 

    The article discusses an approach in achieving diversity in U.S. college admissions and in the campus. The Supreme Court ruling in the case Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003 upholding the value of racial diversity in university admissions provided an opportunity to students who have been left out....

  • Don't Tell, Don't Ask: Narrow Tailoring After Grutter and Gratz. Ayres, Ian; Foster, Sydney // Texas Law Review;Feb2007, Vol. 85 Issue 3, p517 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger cases, which affirmed that admission programs of public schools should provide an individualized consideration for minority students. The effects of the court's decision on the interpretation...

  • WHEN "VICTORY" MASKS RETREAT: THE LSAT, CONSTITUTIONAL DUALISM, AND THE END OF DIVERSITY. Jones, D. Marvin // St. John's Law Review;Winter2006, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p15 

    The article discusses the issue of racism in relation to the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) in the United States. The story of Africans who killed most of their Spanish captors while aboard the ship Amistad is presented. It includes the Grutter versus Bollinger case which involved Barbara...

  • RACIAL PREFERENCE VERSUS NONDISCRIMINATION. Crawford, Curtis // Society;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p51 

    This article considers the court cases Grutter versus Bollinger and Gratz versus Bollinger in relation to racial preference and nondiscrimination in school admission. The litigation of the two cases revealed large racial inequalities in the treatment of applicants with similar academic...

  • RACIAL PREFERENCE VERSUS NONDISCRIMINATION. Crawford, Curtis // Society;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p51 

    This article considers the court cases Grutter versus Bollinger and Gratz versus Bollinger in relation to racial preference and nondiscrimination in school admission. The litigation of the two cases revealed large racial inequalities in the treatment of applicants with similar academic...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics