Detection of Hearing Loss Using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions

Fitzgerald, Tracy S.; Prieve, Beth A.
October 2005
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2005, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p1165
Academic Journal
Although many distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) may be measured in the ear canal in response to 2 pure tone stimuli, the majority of clinical studies have focused exclusively on the DPOAE at the frequency 2f1-f2. This study investigated another DPOAE, 2f2-f1, in an attempt to determine the following: (a) the optimal stimulus parameters for its clinical measurement and (b) its utility in differentiating between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears at low-to-mid frequencies (≤2000 Hz) when measured either alone or in conjunction with the 2f1-f2 DPOAE. Two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, the effects of primary level, level separation, and frequency separation (f2/f1) on 2f2-f1 DPOAE level were evaluated in normal-hearing ears for low-to-mid f2 frequencies (700-2000 Hz). Moderately high-level primaries (60-70 dB SPL) presented at equal levels or with f2 slightly higher than f1 produced the highest 2f2-f1 DPOAE levels. When the f2/f1 ratio that produced the highest 2f2-f1 DPOAE levels was examined across participants, the mean optimal f2/f1 ratio across f2 frequencies and primary level separations was 1.08. In Experiment 2, the accuracy with which DPOAE level or signal-to-noise ratio identified hearing status at the f2 frequency as normal or impaired was evaluated using clinical decision analysis. The 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 DPOAEs were measured from both normalhearing and hearing-impaired ears using 2 sets of stimulus parameters: (a) the traditional parameters for measuring the 2f1-f2 DPOAE (f2/f1 = 1.22; L1, L2 = 65, 55 dB SPL) and (b) the new parameters that were deemed optimal for the 2f2-f1 DPOAE in Experiment 1 (f2/f1 = 1.073, L1 and L2 = 65 dB SPL). Identification of hearing status using 2f2-f1 DPOAE level and signal-to-noise ratio was more accurate when the new stimulus parameters were used compared with the results achieved when the 2f2-f1 DPOAE was recorded using the traditional parameters. However, identification of hearing status was less accurate for the 2f2-f1 DPOAE measured using the new parameters than for the 2f1-f2 DPOAE measured using the traditional parameters. No statistically significant improvements in test performance were achieved when the information from the 2 DPOAEs was combined, either by summing the DPOAE levels or by using logistic regression analysis.


Related Articles

  • OTOF mutation screening in Japanese severe to profound recessive hearing loss patients. Yoh-ichiro Iwasa; Shin-ya Nishio; Hidekane Yoshimura; Yukihiko Kanda; Kozo Kumakawa; Satoko Abe; Yasushi Naito; Kyoko Nagai; Shin-ichi Usami // BMC Medical Genetics;2013, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a unique form of hearing loss that involves absence or severe abnormality of auditory brainstem response (ABR), but also the presence of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). However, with age, the OAEs disappear, making it difficult to...

  • HEARING LOSS--IT'S NOT JUST THE EARBUDS.  // Mix;Nov2008, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p19 

    The article cites key research findings indicating that 16.1% of adults had speech-frequency hearing loss in the U.S. from 2003 to 2004. The incidence of speech-frequency hearing loss was observed to be increasing among people who are 20 to 29 years old. It also occurred earlier in people who...

  • Dehiscence of Bone Overlying the Superior Semicircular Canal as a Cause of an Air-Bone Gap on Audiometry: A Case Study. Cox, Kenneth M.; Lee, Daniel J.; Carey, John P.; Minor, Lloyd B. // American Journal of Audiology;Jun2003, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p11 

    Describes a patient with bilateral superior canal dehiscence who had bilateral low-frequency conductive hearing loss, normal middle ear function and intact vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. Case study; Evaluation of responses to vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials; Discussion.

  • 10d Hearing Loss and screening. Rodgers, Rosemary W. // Practice Nurse;5/23/2003, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p75 

    Presents guidelines for nurses on the diagnosis of hearing loss. Categories of the causes of deafness; Screening process for patients with a hearing loss; Discussion of the use of audiograms as part of a hearing assessment. INSETS: OBJECTIVE TESTING TO IDENTIFY HEARING...

  • audiology. Peters, Michael // BMA A-Z Family Medical Encyclopedia;2004, p79 

    A definition of the term "audiology" is presented. It refers to the study of hearing, particularly hearing disorders or impairment.

  • hearing loss. Peters, Michael // BMA A-Z Family Medical Encyclopedia;2004, p363 

    A definition of the term "hearing loss" is presented, which refers to a deterioration in the ability to perceive sound.

  • HEARING LOSS IN YOUNG ADULTS WHO HAD VENTILATION TUBE INSERTION IN CHILDHOOD. de Beer, Brechtje A.; Snik, Ad F.; Schilder, Anne G.M.; Zielhuis, Gerhard A.; Ingels, Koen; Graamans, Kees // Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology;Jun2004, Vol. 113 Issue 6, p438 

    It is known that insertion of ventilation tubes can cause damage to the tympanic membrane and hearing deterioration in the long term. To investigate long-term effects of recurrent otitis media and of ventilation tube insertion, we used a study group (n = 358 subjects), with or without a history...

  • BOX 9-5 DEAFNESS. Scanlon, Valerie C.; Sanders, Tina // Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology;Jan2007, p214 

    Information on deafness from Chapter 9 of the book "Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology" is presented. It defines deafness as the inability to hear properly. It explains how deafness is classified into different types. It identifies the cause of conduction deafness, nerve deafness, and central...

  • Minimizing Acquired Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Kujawa, Sharon G. // ASHA Leader;4/13/2004, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p10 

    Discusses ways to prevent sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Use of hearing aids and cochlear implants; Molecular bases of hearing losses; Genetic contributions to acquired SNHL susceptibility.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics