TITLE

Too much or not enough?

AUTHOR(S)
Geiselman, Bruce
PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
Waste News;1/2/2006, Vol. 11 Issue 19, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that plans by federal regulators in the U.S. to revise air quality standards for particle pollution could require some power plant operators to take further emission reduction steps. However, the changes could be good news for farmers and mine operators concerned about minimizing dust from their operations. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to tighten the air quality standard for fine particle pollution, such as that emitted by coal-burning power plants, but to eliminate a standard for coarse particles in rural areas that come from the Earth's crust.
ACCESSION #
19431107

 

Related Articles

  • New EPA rule could boost air pollution.  // State Government News;Jan2004, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p10 

    Focuses on a new rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would govern air emissions from old industry plants in the U.S. as of January 2004. Effect of the new rule on the New Source Review provision of the Clean Air Act which requires the installation of modern pollution...

  • MACT - NESHAPs Historical Review. Sajedi, Sarah; O'Lochlainn, Ross // Pollution Engineering;Dec2010, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p13 

    The article focuses on the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to eliminate hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emissions. It says that the standard from the MACT approach is the National Emission Standards for Hazardous...

  • The long road to Tier 4. Lustig, David // Railway Gazette International;Oct2012, Vol. 168 Issue 10, p25 

    The article discusses preparation being done by the railroad sector prior to the implementation of Tier 4 emissions standards by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The regulation which would take effect in January 2015 will require reduction of particulate emissions by 70 percent....

  • NEW JERSEY V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Morales, Nicholas // Harvard Environmental Law Review;2009, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p263 

    The article discusses the case of New Jersey v. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the regulation of power plant emissions of mercury and other hazardous pollutants. The Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) was promulgated to set emission standards and establish a cap-and-trade system...

  • EPA needs better data before proposing mercury-reduction standards.  // Mining Engineering;Jul2004, Vol. 56 Issue 7, p6 

    Reports on the impact of the quality of emissions data used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the use of coal reserves by power plants in the U.S. Findings of a study on the sources of the emissions data used by the EPA; Factors to be considered for the effective...

  • Proposed Rules: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;10/23/2013, Vol. 78 Issue 205, p63145 

    The article presents three notices of proposed rules issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The first notice proposes to promulgate the revisions to the state implementation plan (SIP) submitted by the state of Hawaii. The second notice proposes to approve the air quality...

  • EPA's clean air rule could send CAP rates sky high. WEST, CAROL // Inside Tucson Business;2/22/2013, Vol. 22 Issue 39, p22 

    The author discusses the impact of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed clean air rule on the Navajo Generating Station, a coal-powered plant near Page, Arizona, in 2013. She says that proposal of the EPA to install nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission controls could increase the...

  • EPA ponders rule aiding coal-based power. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;9/12/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p26 

    The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is planning to propose a rule change that would allow coal-burning power plants to increase their emissions without installing modern pollution controls when upgrading their facilities. The Natural Resources Defense Council said...

  • EPA proposes new rules.  // Modern Power Systems;May2011, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p39 

    The article reports on the proposed rules issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on controlling emissions of mercury and acid gases from coal and oil fired power plants in the country. According to EPA, the rule will eliminate 20 years of uncertainty across industry. Moreover,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics