TITLE

Eleventh Circuit Requires EPA to Review Methods Used by States to Measure Water Quality

AUTHOR(S)
Granger, Leah
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p735
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the decision on the case Florida Public Interest Research Group v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, concerning the agency's duty to review water quality standards. The ruling is a success for citizen watchdog groups concerned about the attempts of states to circumvent the requirements of the Clean Water Act through complicated administrative rule changes. The lower court was required to investigate whether the agency is enforcing clean water laws and oversee the review of Impaired Water Program in Florida.
ACCESSION #
19324132

 

Related Articles

  • Public Comment Period for Joint Rapanos Guidance Extended.  // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p21 

    The article announces the extension of the public comment period by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Rapanos vs. United States case. The U.S. EPA, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have teamed-up...

  • THE EPA OVERSTEPPED ITS STATUTORY AUTHORITY UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT. MCINTOSH, CAROLYN L. // Coal Age;Oct2011, Vol. 116 Issue 10, p64 

    In this article, the author discusses the ruling in the court case between National Mining Association and Jackson, in which the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Walton overturned a current 404 permitting process, holding that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)...

  • A SUPREMELY GOOD REASON TO SMILE.  // Onearth;Summer2007, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p43 

    The article reports that on April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Bush Administration's claim that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has no authority to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act. The court ruled that the greenhouse gas is an air pollutant like any...

  • Transforming Water Transfers: The Evolution of Water Transfer Case Law and the NPDES Water Transfers Proposed Rule. Colangelo, Sara // Ecology Law Quarterly;2008, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p107 

    Water transfers, the human-induced movement of water from one place to another, have historically sustained development of vast areas of otherwise uninhabitable land in the western United States, and have recently become a popular method for alleviating water allocation problems and scarcity in...

  • High Court Not In A State Of Denial. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p10 

    Discusses whether the U.S. Supreme Court will grant requests for reviews of environmental law cases in the U.S. Information on a pending decision of the Supreme Court for the case U.S. Environmental Protection Agency versus Sierra Club; Details of environmental law cases granted by the Supreme...

  • USING ALASKA V. EPA TO UNMASK THE CLEAN AIR ACT. Bridges, Bonnie // Energy Law Journal;2004, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p431 

    Discusses the case Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Enforcement of the Clean Air Act in Alaska; Basis of the court in its decision; Analysis of the case.

  • DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE V. EPA: TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF FEDERAL AGENCY POWER UNDER THE ESA. Bosse, Sherry L. // Environmental Law (00462276);Summer2006, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p1025 

    In August 2005, the Ninth Circuit reversed an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decision to delegate National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting authority to the state of Arizona under the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Defenders of Wildlife v. EPA. The lead plaintiff,...

  • Sierra Club v. EPA, 536 F.3d 673 (D.C. Cir. 2008). Walley Jr., E. Kenneth // Tulane Environmental Law Journal;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p175 

    The article discusses the emission limits and monitoring requirements under the permit program of Title V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) in the U.S. It mentions that the program is subject to approval of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wherein they would ensure strict compliance rather...

  • Riverkeeper, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Finally a Solution the Courts Can Live With … Almost. Dennis-Parks, Reda M. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p689 

    The article discusses the ruling on the case Riverkeeper Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning regulations for reducing harm to aquatic life caused by power plant water intake. The court has upheld an EPA regulation and used some very strong regulation in support...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics