TITLE

The Supreme Court Modifies Homestead Claimants' Property Rights in BedRoc Ltd. v. United States

AUTHOR(S)
Ryan, Katherine Daniels
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p683
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case BedRoc Ltd. v. United States, concerning the sand and gravel rights under the Pittman Underground Water Act of 1919. The ruling was distinguished from an earlier decision in Watt v. Western Nuclear Inc., which held that the sand and gravel rights are reserved for land patented under the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA). Principles of statutory distinction were refined and the court also determined that people claiming title to land patented under the Pittman Act have different property rights compared to those with land patented under the SRHA.
ACCESSION #
19324125

 

Related Articles

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1991: Did it Really Overturn Wards Cove? Gullett, C. Ray // Labor Law Journal;Jul92, Vol. 43 Issue 7, p462 

    This article examines the significance of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to the overturning of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings involving employment rights, including the case Wards Cove versus Atonio. Leaving aside the political pressures that resulted in the construction and...

  • ONE LAWYER'S CRYSTAL BALL. Lucero, Lora A. // Planning;Nov2010, Vol. 76 Issue 9, p17 

    The article offers information on the possible cases that courts and legislatures will be tackling in the U.S. It states that tensions between regulatory hawks and property rights crowd will remain high. Meanwhile, natural and man-made disasters is expected to increase in frequency and severity....

  • Why It's More Important than Ever to Check Your Policies for Age Discrimination.  // Nonprofit World;Nov/Dec2005, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p6 

    The article reports that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case, Smith v. City of Jackson, broadens the way courts interpret the age discrimination law. The Court ruled that employees may bring age discrimination suits based on polices or practices that tend to have a greater impact on...

  • The Evolution of Eminent Domain: A Remedy for Market Failure or an Effort to Limit Government Power and Government Failure? Benson, Bruce L. // Independent Review;Winter2008, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p423 

    The article deals with the historical development of and resistance to taking powers in England and with efforts to constrain it. It then turns to colonial America and the efforts to limit government powers, known as power of eminent domain, to confiscate property in the U.S. constitution....

  • CHRISTOPHER, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. v. HARBURY: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Christopher, Former Secretary of State, et al. v. Harbury, case number 01-394, argued on March 18, 2002 and decided on June 20, 2002. The respondent held that U.S. government officials violated her constitutional right of access to...

  • Developing a "Rationale" for Administrative Policies and Practices: The Key to Avoiding Litigation. DeLand, Gary W. // Corrections Managers' Report;Apr/May2010, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p91 

    The article presents several significant case decisions used by courts to credit or discredit correctional policies in the U.S. In 1979, the U.S. Supreme Court settled Bell v. Wolfish and make a step toward ruling in the expansion of the rights cases of the prisoners in the lower federal courts....

  • Controversy Refueled.  // Time;Jul1957, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p48 

    The article focuses on the civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which is said to be the biggest issue posed to the press. According to the Montgomery Advertiser, the administration of justice in the U.S. particularly the used of traditional methods faced crises in terms of application...

  • Employment testing and discrimination in the post-Ricci era.  // HR Specialist: New Jersey Employment Law;Feb2010, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p7 

    The article discusses the legal issues concerning employee testing and employer's violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the U.S. It cites a court case Ricci v. De- Stefano in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that employers violate Title VII if they do not validate job...

  • High Court Rejects Suit for Damages Under P.L. 94-142.  // Education Week;3/9/1983, Vol. 2 Issue 24, p2 

    The article reports on the suit for damages under Education for All Handicapped Children Act or P.L. 94-142 which was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the Rose v. State case, the Court maintained the decision of the Court of Appeals that there were no damages inflicted by Omaha school...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics