TITLE

Property-rights measure overturned

AUTHOR(S)
Stapilus, Randy
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
High Country News;11/14/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 21, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that according to a new ruling, Oregon's property-rights Measure 37, passed by voters in 2004, was unconstitutional. The decision came on October 14, 2005. According to the measure, landowners were allowed to demand compensation from the state or local government if they believed they'd lost property value due to land-use regulations. It also allowed them to demand waiving of those regulations. Oregon's land-use regulations have long been a target for property-rights boosters. A 2002 constitutional amendment similar to Measure 37 was thrown out by the courts, but proponents believed that 37 was bulletproof. Marion County Judge Mary James disagreed and she ruled that the measure was not constitutional. It violated both state and federal constitutions. She said, Measure 37 requires the government to pay if it wants to enforce valid land use regulations and it means that the government must pay to govern. This the legislative body cannot do. She also said that 37 violated separation of powers requirements and applied unequally to property owners.
ACCESSION #
19318368

 

Related Articles

  • SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIMS IN THE LAND-USE CONTEXT: THE NEED FOR A SIMPLE AND INTELLIGENT STANDARD OF REVIEW. Mehrbani, Parna A. // Environmental Law (00462276);Winter2005, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p209 

    When a municipal government denies a landowner's permit or zoning application, the landowner does not have a legitimate ‘takings’ claim if the land is still economically viable. In this situation, an aggrieved landowner can bring a federal claim for violation of substantive due...

  • Land Rights in Rural China since 1978. Vendryes, Thomas // China Perspectives;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 4, p87 

    Since 1978, changes in rural land policies have constituted a critical dimension in the evolution of the Chinese economy toward liberalisation and marketisation. This paper aims at reviewing the institutional changes that took place in Chinese rural areas, with a particular focus on two...

  • TAKINGS CLAUSE--TAKE THREE. Callies, David L. // ABA Journal;Nov87, Vol. 73 Issue 11, p48 

    Focuses on U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on cases dealing with private property rights and local land-use regulation under the Fifth Amendment. Taking issue in the case, Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis; Appropriateness of compensation for total regulatory takings; Decision...

  • Private Property Rights and Compulsory Acquisition Process in Nigeria: the Past, Present and Future. OTUBU, Akintunde // Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica;2012, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p5 

    Abstract: Objectives: A property right is the exclusive authority to determine how a resource is used, whether that resource is owned by government or by individuals. In the context of land, it is the authority of the land owner to determine its use or otherwise. On the other hand, compulsory...

  • Pay or Waive: An Economic Assessment of Property Owner Compensation Laws in the United States. Grout, Cyrus; Plantinga, Andrew J.; Jaeger, William K. // Review of Environmental Economics & Policy;Jan2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p103 

    Land-use regulations are contentious everywhere because of their potential negative effects on private property values. In recent years, so-called pay or waive compensation legislation was passed in a number of US states, requiring governments to compensate property owners for losses due to...

  • Round 3 for Eminent Domain. Shigley, Paul // Planning;Mar2007, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p11 

    The article reports on issues and topics related to ballot measures that limit the use of eminent domain in the U.S. Less than a month after voters in nine states approved the ballot measures, property rights advocates were becoming more optimistic of their victory. According to the group, the...

  • 'Not in My Backyard!'.  // Indiana Lawyer;12/4/2013, Vol. 24 Issue 20, p14A 

    The article focuses on the issue concerning on the impact of the proposed changes for land to the land owners which made by the local business, roadway and developers in Indiana.

  • PROPERTY RIGHT TAKING AND COMPENSATION: A FURTHER ANALYSIS. Hackbart, Merlin M.; Madden, John L. // Annals of Regional Science;Mar1978, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p82 

    Considers two related aspects of land use planning issues and restrictions. Review of legal property rights issues regarding the need for compensation if property rights are restricted by a land use covenant; Extension of capitalized value theory as method for conceptualizing the appropriate...

  • Private land use, changing public values, and notions of... Butler, Lynda L. // Brigham Young University Law Review;1992, Vol. 1992 Issue 3, p629 

    Focuses on the government land use regulations for private property. Reaction of private property owners to expanded land use regulation; Views of property owners to regulations which have economic impact; What is recognized in the Due Process and Takings Clauses of the Constitution.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics