TITLE

Calpine Spat Is Only Tip of the Iceberg

AUTHOR(S)
Lewis, Janet
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
Investment Dealers' Digest;12/12/2005, Vol. 71 Issue 47, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article provides information about a lawsuit between California-based power generator Calpine Corp. and a group of hedge fund creditors. Calpine was fighting to stave off filing for bankruptcy while a group of holders of its second-lien bonds argued for immediate repayment after the company spent some of the cash they lent to buy fuel, contrary to the provisions of the notes. These hedge funds are large players in the riskiest financings. Hedge funds are also becoming increasingly aggressive in seeking out lending opportunities themselves, offering funding directly to companies.
ACCESSION #
19275828

 

Related Articles

  • Sellers Beware, As Debtors Continue the Challenge to Section 503(b)(9): Anticipate the Attack Through Terms and Conditions. Thorne, Deborah // Business Credit;Nov2011, Vol. 113 Issue 9, p16 

    The article offers information on Bankruptcy Code, Section 503(b)(9) of the U.S. It specifically discusses whether a 503(b)(9) administrative expense can be enforced if the creditor delivers or drop ships the goods to someone other than the debtor. It is informed that Section 503(b)(9) created...

  • THE CREDITOR AS PARTICIPANT IN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS. ADAM, Anca Roxana // International Conference : CKS - Challenges of the Knowledge Soc;2014, p71 

    A creditor is the party who, within a binding judicial relationship, has a claim on the services of giving, doing or not doing of the second party, called debtor. In insolvency a creditor is an individual or a legal entity that is entitled to claim payment of an amount of money by the debtor, in...

  • Intercreditor Agreements Face Bankruptcy Court Scrutiny � A Cautionary Tale. Reyen, Michael E. // Pratt's Journal of Bankruptcy Law;May2012, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p338 

    In the case, In re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the assignment of voting rights within an intercreditor agreement is not enforceable. The author of this article discusses the decision and its ramifications.

  • Puerto Rico Meeting Urges Bankruptcy, Despite Attendee Concerns. Casey, Jack // Bond Buyer;10/15/2015, Vol. 1 Issue 34394, p1 

    Puerto Rican civic, political, and business leaders from around the country met in Orlando Wednesday to rally for extending Chapter 9 bankruptcy to Puerto Rico public authorities but one speaker at the event urged caution in throwing support behind such a measure.

  • Respite for debt dodgers. Kavanagh, John // BRW;9/23/2004, Vol. 26 Issue 37, p70 

    Reports on the slow progress of efforts to reform the Bankruptcy Act in Australia. Prevention of theuse of the law to avoid the payment of taxes and other debts; Approval of the personal insolvency agreements; Release of an exposure draft which dealth with claw-back of tainted money from third...

  • BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE ACTIONS. Norris, Benjamin R. // Banking Law Journal;Jun2004, Vol. 121 Issue 6, p483 

    The article presents information on the basics of bankruptcy preference actions, defenses and claims by the debtor. A preference action is a suit by a bankruptcy debtor, seeking recovery from a creditor of value received from the debtor during the so-called "preference period" immediately...

  • Another Preference Victory for the Trade: New Value Paid Post-Petition Does Count! Nathan, Bruce // Business Credit;Feb2012, Vol. 114 Issue 2, p20 

    The article reports that the trade creditor community in the U.S. has benefitted from the ruling in Friedman's Inc. v. Roth Staffing Companies L.P. case that includes all new value paid post-petition as part of a creditor's new value defense to a preference claim. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for...

  • The Playmate The Fortune And The Bankruptcy Court Battle.  // Commercial Law World;Nov/Dec2011, p17 

    The article focuses on the lawsuit between Stern v. Marshall. The chief justice determined that Since Stern v. Marshall has been decided, some secured creditors have argued that the bankruptcy courts no longer have the authority to hear motions for relief from stay because the bankruptcy courts...

  • BANKRUPTCY ACT -- DECISION OF ARBITRATOR NOT AN "UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCE"  // Arbitration Journal;Mar1967, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p57 

    The article focuses on the bankruptcy act which states that in the absence of special circumstances, a bankruptcy court is not required to prevent an arbitrator from determining whether a debt has been discharged in bankruptcy, with reference to the court case, Fallick versus Kehr. While the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics