TITLE

A LEAK FROM THE SUPREME COURT

PUB. DATE
October 1979
SOURCE
National Review;10/12/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 41, p1319
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article comments on the alleged politicization of the judicial system of the United States. President Jimmy Carter's decision to supplement the federal judiciary by 150 additional District Court judges has raised questions on whether the president's move encroach on the power of the judiciary. The opinions of legal observers are given.
ACCESSION #
19178676

 

Related Articles

  • Here Come The Judges Who should choose them--and how?  // Time;12/11/1978, Vol. 112 Issue 24, p67 

    The article offers information on how federal judges in U.S. are chosen. It states that U.S. President Jimmy Carter suggests on the appointment of panels of lawyers and laymen to recommend qualified nominees for federal judges and the final choice will be made by the president. It mentions that...

  • US Women Federal Court Judges Appointed by President Carter. Martin, Elaine // Feminist Legal Studies;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p43 

    There is considerable disagreement as to whether any gender differences on the bench are symbolic, substantive, or both. This paper, based on never-before published surveys and personal interviews conducted in the early 1980s, contributes to that discussion by describing what women appointed to...

  • Tolerance and Subjection in Native American Religious Practices. Zielske, Daniel P. // Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 5, Special section p1 

    The United States of America prides itself on the ideal of "freedom of religion," yet Native American religions were outlawed until 1978, when then President Jimmy Carter signed the Freedom of Religion Act. For the first time, Native Americans were allowed to practice their religion openly....

  • RETHINKING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION BASED ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS: A PRACTICAL CRITIQUE OF POST- CAPER TON PROPOSALS AND A CALL FOR GREATER TRANSPARENCY. McInerney, Ryan M. // Nevada Law Journal;Summer2011, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p815 

    The article discusses the effectiveness of the judicial-disqualification proposals to prevent unbiased judicial ruling in the U.S. It says that most Americans believed that a judge should be disqualified from hearing a trial that involves a party who had contributed to his or her judicial...

  • Who appointed her, and how can we get rid of her? Parker, Shafer // Report / Newsmagazine (National Edition);10/09/2000, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p2 

    Offers the author's thoughts on Justice Lesley Baldwin of the Ontario Court of Justice in St. Catharines. Opinion that she has turned Ontario's justice system into a political forum for her radical feminist views; Her role in the decision to treat Karla Homolka as a battered wife.

  • A Tournament of Judges? Gulati, Mitu; Choi, Stephen // California Law Review;Jan2004, Vol. 92 Issue 1, p299 

    We suggest a Tournament of Judges where the reward to the winner is elevation to the Supreme Court. Politics (and ideology) surely has a role to play in the selection of justices. However, the present level of partisan bickering has resulted in delays in judicial appointments as well as...

  • Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia. Weiden, David L. // Political Research Quarterly;Jun2011, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p335 

    This article proposes a new cross-national thesis for judicial decision making. The judicial politicization theory posits that judges on highly politicized high courts will be more likely to decide cases using ideological and attitudinal factors than judges at less politicized courts. The theory...

  • Living Proof of Change. Tebo, Margaret Graham // ABA Journal;Dec2000, Vol. 86 Issue 12, p94 

    Offers a look at the American Bar Association Forum on Justice Improvements in Scottsdale, Arizona, that discusses how justice initiatives directly affect people. Details on changes that occurred in the life of Jeremy Estrada due to a compassionate judge and judicial system; Relationship...

  • Politics threaten Arizona's independent judiciary. Sethi, Dev K. // Inside Tucson Business;1/23/2006, Vol. 15 Issue 32, p6 

    The article reflects on the impact of political pressure that the author claims is threatening Arizona's independent judiciary. The author revealed that the Conservative Right, particularly the Center for Arizona Policy, wants a change from the merit selection process to judicial elections....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics