TITLE

Morphodynamical Abduction. Causation by Attractors Dynamics of Explanatory Hypotheses in Science

AUTHOR(S)
Magnani, Lorenzo; Piazza, Matteo
PUB. DATE
March 2005
SOURCE
Foundations of Science;Mar2005, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p107
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Philosophers of science today by and large reject the cataclysmic and irrational interpretation of the scientific enterprise claimed by Kuhn. Many computational models have been implemented to rationally study the conceptual change in science. In this recent tradition a key role is played by the concept of abduction as a mechanism by which new explanatory hypotheses are introduced. Nevertheless some problems in describing the most interesting abductive issues rise from the classical computational approach. It describes a cognitive process (and so abduction) by the manipulation of internal symbolic representations of external world. This view assumes a discrete set of representations fixed in discrete time jumps, and cannot adequately account for the issue of anticipation and causation of a new hypothesis. An integration of the traditional computational view with some ideas developed inside the so-called dynamical approach can suggest some important insights. The concept of attractor is very significant. It permits a description of the abductive generation of new hypotheses in terms of a catastrophic rearrangement of the parameters responsible for the behavior of the system.
ACCESSION #
19094887

 

Related Articles

  • The generalized Sleeping Beauty problem: a challenge for thirders. White, Roger // Analysis;Apr2006, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p114 

    The article comments on answers to the generalized Sleeping Beauty problem. the majority of philosophers who have written on the puzzle have concluded that the correct answer is 1/3. Thirders include authors and pilosophers, Arntzenius, Dorr, Elga, Hitchcock, Horgan, Monton and Weintraub. Lewis...

  • 'Science' or 'Sciences': the difference one letter makes. Gevers, Wieland // South African Journal of Science;May/Jun2004, Vol. 100 Issue 5/6, p235 

    The article discusses the difference between the word "science" and "sciences". One does not have to be a professional philosopher of science to be intrigued by the inconsistent use of the word "Science(s)" in the names of journals and scholarly bodies such as academies. Most of the national...

  • Does Science Presuppose Naturalism (or Anything at All)? Fishman, Yonatan; Boudry, Maarten // Science & Education;May2013, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p921 

    Several scientists, scientific institutions, and philosophers have argued that science is committed to Methodological Naturalism (MN), the view that science, by virtue of its methods, is limited to studying 'natural' phenomena and cannot consider or evaluate hypotheses that refer to supernatural...

  • Sidney. Wieseltier, Leon // New Republic;8/16/2004, Vol. 231 Issue 7/8, p34 

    Reflects on the life and death of philosopher Sidney Morgenbesser. Highlights of his personality; How he is remembered for his hilarity, but also for his study of logic and reason; Details of his Jewish heritage; Commentary on death.

  • Why counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism are incompatible. Stone, Jim // Analysis;Jan2005, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p24 

    The article discusses as to why counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism are incompatible. The article adds that if God creates ex nihilo a bronze statue of a unicorn; later he annihilates it. The statue and the piece of bronze occupy the same space for their entire career. If God had recast...

  • "LET US (NOT) THEORIZE THE SPACES OF CONTENTION.". Ceccarelli, Leah M. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Summer2005, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p30 

    The article presents a response to a rationale for inquiry on the science and technology controversy. When scientists whose results run counter to the interests of the party currently in power find themselves the subject of intimidation, the call to reclaim the power of public deliberation and...

  • KAZIMIERZ TWARDOWSKI ON PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE. Bro┼╝ek, Anna // Polish Analytical Philosophy;2016, Vol. 106, p153 

    The article discusses philosopher Kazimierz Twardowski's views on philosophy and science. He classified sciences into aprioristic and aposterioristic, and deductive and inductive based on his classification of reasoning. Several ideas and philosophical hypotheses by Twardowski were also...

  • Counterexamples to a likelihood theory of evidence. Forster, Malcolm // Minds & Machines;Aug2006, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p319 

    The likelihood theory of evidence (LTE) says, roughly, that all the information relevant to the bearing of data on hypotheses (or models) is contained in the likelihoods. There exist counterexamples in which one can tell which of two hypotheses is true from the full data, but not from the...

  • Causal Reasoning in Physics. Farr, Matt // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Dec2016, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p1207 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics