TITLE

Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques

AUTHOR(S)
Lahat, G.; Tulchinsky, H.; Goldman, G.; Klauzner, J.; Rabau, M.
PUB. DATE
December 2005
SOURCE
Techniques in Coloproctology;Dec2005, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p206
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background Closure of ileostomy is considered a contaminated operation. The infection rate of the stoma wound is =30%. Several ileostomy-closure techniques intended to reduce the high rate of infection have been described in the literature. Among them, delayed primary closure of the stoma wound is a commonly used method that was reported to reduce the infection rate according to several retrospective studies. We therefore conducted the first prospective randomized trial comparing primary with delayed primary closure of a stoma wound. Methods During 2003, 40 patients were admitted to our ward for closure of ileostomy. The ileostomies were taken down by the same team using the same surgical technique except for the technique of wound closure. We randomly divided the patients into two groups. In Group 1 (n=20), the wound was left open for delayed primary closure and not closed until postoperative day 4. In Group 2, the wound was primarily closed at the end of the procedure. Results The total wound infection rate was relatively low (15%). Infection occurred more frequently (4 cases, 20%) in Group 1 than in Group 2 (2 cases, 10%). The length of hospital stay was similar for both groups. Conclusions In this first prospective comparison of two techniques during ileostomy take down, primary closure unexpectedly produced less wound infection than delayed primary closure.
ACCESSION #
19076845

 

Related Articles

  • Temporary loop ileostomy. Raimes, S. A.; Mathew, V. V.; Devlin, H. B. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Sep1984, Vol. 77 Issue 9, p738 

    A refinement of the technique for constructing the temporary loop ileostomy using a subcutaneous absorbable bridge is described. This leaves the skin surface uncluttered and allows immediate fitting of a watertight appliance. Clinical experience in 22 patients confirms that this is a safe,...

  • PROBLEMS IN ILEOSTOMY FUNCTION. Fierst, Sidney M.; Lazar, Alexander J. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Sep1962, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p336 

    1. It is felt that most of the complications of ileostomy are preventable. 2. The cause of the dysfunction is either due to poor orientation of the patient, inadequate surgical planning or poor fitting of the prosthesis.

  • Modification of end-loop ileostomy for the treatment of ischemic or radiation enteritis. Tepetes, Konstantinos; Liakou, Paraskevi; Balogiannis, Ioannis; Kouvaraki, Maria; Hatzitheofilou, Konstantinos; Sijens, Paul E.; Fichera, Alessandro // World Journal of Gastroenterology;8/14/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 30, p4776 

    AIM: To evaluate a new technique of temporary ileal anastomotic stoma, following small bowel resection, in patients where the anastomosis is anticipated to have borderline margins with dubious viability. METHODS: Five patients underwent enterectomy and partially anastomosed end-loop ileostomy at...

  • The loop stoma bridge--a new technique. Harish, K. // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;May2008, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p958 

    Background: Conventionally, supporting rods made of glass, plastic, or similar material have been used for 1 week to 10 days for loop stomas to prevent retraction. However, this is associated with difficulty in applying the stomal appliance till removal of the rod resulting in...

  • Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal. WADA, YUMA; MIYOSHI, NORIKATSU; MASAYUKI OHUE; NOURA, SHINGO; FUJINO, SHIKI; SUGIMURA, KEIJIROU; AKITA, HIROFUMI; MOTOORI, MASAAKI; GOTOH, KUNIHITO; TAKAHASHI, HIDENORI; KOBAYASHI, SHOGO; OHMORI, TAKESHI; FUJIWARA, YOSHIYUKI; YANO, MASAHIKO // Molecular & Clinical Oncology;2015, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p619 

    The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications, including superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI) following purse-string skin closure (PS) and conventional skin closure with a drainage tube (CD) following stoma closure. A total of 55 consecutive...

  • Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Eckmann, C.; Kujath, P.; Schiedeck, T. H. K.; Shekarriz, H.; Bruch, H.-P. // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Mar2004, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p128 

    Background and aims. This study analyzed the results of a standardized approach in anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer without performance of a protective ileostomy during the primary operation. Patients and methods. The study included all 306 patients with...

  • Reversal of ileostomy utilising Lone Star Retractor Systemâ„¢. Glaysher, M.; Moran, B. // Techniques in Coloproctology;Nov2014, Vol. 18 Issue 11, p1125 

    The article focuses on the reversal of ileostomy by using the Lone Star Retractor System. For ileostomy closure, an initial elliptical incision is made around the stoma and extended down to the subcutaneous tissue. The retractor ring is then fixed and centred on the stoma, with hooks are placed...

  • Physiological and pharmacological properties of a modified Brooke ileostomy: justification for retaining the most distal ileum. Quinn, Martha; Robertson, Isabell; Speirs, Mary; Shumeyko, Vlad; Sharma, Praveen; Macdonald, Angus // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Jul2013, Vol. 28 Issue 7, p973 

    Purpose: The traditional Brooke ileostomy removed the last 8-15 cm of the ileum due to concern of occurrence of terminal ileal Crohn's disease, vide infra the ileocolic sphincter was removed. Retaining all the terminal ileum has the potential of retaining the ileocolic sphincter. Our aim was to...

  • A new method of ileostomy formation following surgery for colonic obstruction. Patel, R.; MacDonald, A.; Sunderland, G. // Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh;Dec99, Vol. 44 Issue 6, p378 

    Describes a method of forming an ileostomy in a case of a left sided colonic obstruction. Ileostomy formation; Surgical technique.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics