NIXON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, et al. v. SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT PAC et al.; certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit
Tags: NIXON v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC (Supreme Court case); CAMPAIGN funds -- Law & legislation; ELECTION law; JUDGMENTS; POLITICAL campaigns; UNITED States. Supreme Court; POLITICAL participation
Related Articles
- NIXON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, et al. v. SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT PAC et al.; certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Nixon, Attorney General of Missouri et al. v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC et al., case number 98-963, argued on October 5, 1999 and decided on January 24, 2000. The case focuses on the constitutionality of political campaign fund...
- SHRINK MISSOURI, CAMPAIGN FINANCE, AND 'THE THING THAT WOULDN'T LEAVE'. Hasen, Richard L. // Constitutional Commentary;Winter2000, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p483
Discusses the campaign finance case, Nixon versus Shrink Missouri Government Political Action Committee, decided by the United States Supreme Court. Background on the case; How the majority of the Shrink Missouri Court significantly lowered the bar for constitutional scrutiny of campaign...
- U.S. Supreme Court Reaffirms the Right to Limit Contributions. // State Legislatures;Apr2000, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p9
Reports on a United States Supreme Court decision in January 2000 that reaffirmed a state's right to limit campaign contributions. Details of the `Nixon vs. Shrink Missouri Government Political Action Committee'; Court's reiteration that contribution limits did not impair free speech nor did...
- New Rules of the Game. Carney, Eliza Newlin; Stone, Peter H.; Barnes, James A. // National Journal;12/20/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 51/52, p3800
Comments on the flow of unregulated campaign funds in the U.S. despite the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court to deny a campaign finance law that bans the campaign contributions. Implications of the ruling to the U.S. political system; Criticisms against the law; Action taken by political parties...
- Freer money. // Hill;6/26/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 77, p32
The author reflects on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court related to the nation's campaign finance laws. The Court struck down the ban on corporations and labor unions buying television advertisements in the run-up to elections. The author explains that the court's decision will probably mean...
- Clean Elections may finally be washed up. Hamer, Glenn // Inside Tucson Business;9/22/2008, Vol. 18 Issue 16, p32
The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to struck down a federal campaign finance law in Tucson, Arizona. The decision aims to finally washed up Arizona's experiment with tax-payer-financed elections. Taxpayer-financed elections restrict candidate's ability to communicate...
- Money Can't Be Speech. Okun, Arthur M. // Challenge (05775132);Mar/Apr76, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p52
The article expresses a grave concern on the undue and unjustified importance, being given to money. The case before the U.S. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the 1974 legislation limiting campaign contributions has evoked some comments that seem to reflect a fundamental...
- The Money Game: Changing the Rules. // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10
The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...
- High Court Decision Should Boost PACs. Icbniowski, Tom // ENR: Engineering News-Record;12/22/2003, Vol. 251 Issue 25, p9
The U.S. Supreme Court's December 10 ruling upholding most parts of the 2002 campaign finance reform law should invigorate political action committees (PAC) and may give a boost to non-television and radio advertisement near elections. The 5-4 decision in the case McConnell v. the U.S. Federal...
