Collateral damage

Atkins, Laura-Jane
November 2005
Lawyer;11/21/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 45, p32
Trade Publication
The article discusses the implications of the decision by Great Britain's High Court on the case of "Crestfort Ltd. v. Tesco Stores Ltd." It notes that the decision serves as a warning to tenants and undertenants seeking to enter into an underlease that is in breach of the alienation provisions of the headlease.


Related Articles

  • Expenditures need to be justified. Murdoch, Sandi // EG: Estates Gazette;2/17/2007, Issue 707, p141 

    The article focuses on the ruling of a court in a case filed by Saint Modwen Developments Ltd. against Tesco Stores Ltd. in Great Britain regarding service charges payable under the lease of a unit of the defendant in the Edmonton Green shopping center. It mentions that the parties required a...

  • St Modwen Developments (Edmonton) Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd.  // EG: Estates Gazette;2/10/2007, Issue 706, p166 

    The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Saint Modwen Developments Ltd. against Tesco Stores Ltd. over service charge dispute in Edmonton, Alberta. Saint Modwen acquired the shopping centre occupied by Tesco under a lease granted by the borough council. The plaintiff demands that the service...

  • Tesco store appeal dismissal clears rival regeneration start. Calton, Rachel // Planning (14672073);7/9/2010, Issue 1876, p5 

    The article repots that Tesco lost its battle in the court case against planning inspector's ruling to block the construction of its proposed stores in north Liverpool, England.

  • Freshfields secures partial victory in Tesco dairy price-fixing case. Chadderton, Sam // Lawyer (Online Edition);12/21/2012, p6 

    The article focuses on the judgment by the British Competition Appeal Tribunal which has practically overturned the OFT's decision that Tesco PLC in collusion with suppliers and other retailers fixed cheese prices in 2003. Other parties to the OFT's Dairy Retail Price Initiatives decision...

  • Health and safety at work.  // Accountancy;Jul1988, Vol. 102 Issue 1139, p49 

    Cites the ruling of the British Bench Divisional Court in the 'Tesco Stores Ltd b Seabridge' case, concerning the health and safety of employees at work. Failure of Tesco as the employer to discharge the duty imposed by section of the Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974.

  • Gough scheme stalled by Tesco 'delaying tactics'  // Building Design;4/28/2006, Issue 1719, p6 

    The article reports on the charges filed against Tesco Corp. related to its maneuver that delays the project of Piers Gough in Sunderland, Great Britain. Tesco withdrew its support to the planned land development project in the city. This move has received criticism among its competitors, as...

  • Tommy Hilfiger is suing Tesco, charges chain sold bogus goods.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;5/29/1998, Vol. 175 Issue 102, p4 

    Reports that Tommy Hilfiger Licensing Incorporated and its sister company Tommy Hilfiger Europe BV sued Tesco PLC, for allegedly selling counterfeit Hilfiger merchandise. Tesco's denial of the allegations; Labels of products being sold by Tesco; Statement from Fred Gehring of Tommy Hilfiger Europe.

  • Padstow butcher takes on Tesco.  // Meat Trades Journal;9/14/2012- MTJ extra, p5 

    The article reports that a Padstow-based butcher owned by Matt Watson Smyth won in the case againts Tesco PLC after demanding the store took down a misleading sign.

  • Gruner & Jahr calls in the OFT over delisting. Cowen, Matthew // Campaign;09/01/2000, Issue 35, p4 

    Reports on Gruner & Jahr's (G&J) decision to take its case against Tesco to the British Office of Fair Trading. Case background; Tesco's delisting of G&J titles.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics