TITLE

House panel passes budget package

AUTHOR(S)
Laws, Forrest
PUB. DATE
November 2005
SOURCE
Southeast Farm Press;11/16/2005, Vol. 32 Issue 26, p38
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the House Agriculture Committee has passed in 2005 an agricultural reconciliation package drafted by Chairman Bob Goodlatte that will cut spending by the U.S. Department of Agriculture by $3.7 billion through 2010. The proposed reduction is 23% more than the $3 billion target assigned the Agriculture Committee by the House Budget Committee.
ACCESSION #
18978786

 

Related Articles

  • Results Act: Observations on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Annual Performance Plan for Fiscal Year 1999: RCED-98-212R.  // GAO Reports;6/11/1998, p1 

    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) annual performance plan for fiscal year 1999. GAO noted that: (1) USDA's performance plan partially meets the criteria set forth in the Government Performance and Results Act and related...

  • Management Letter: Recommendations for Improvements to USDA's Internal Controls and Policies on Premium Class Air Travel. Christopherson Jr., Charles R. // GAO Reports;11/20/2007, p1 

    The article provides information contained in the letter sent to acting Secretary of Agriculture Charles Conner concerning weaknesses in internal controls at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). It was found that the USDA spent over $110 million in air travel from July 1, 2005 through...

  • Livestock Grazing: Federal Expenditures and Receipts Vary, Depending on the Agency and the Purpose of the Fee Charged: GAO-05-86. Nazzaro, Robin M. // GAO Reports;10/31/2005, p1 

    Ranchers pay a fee to graze their livestock on federal land. Grazing occurs primarily on federal land located in the western states managed by 10 federal agencies. Generally, the fee is based on animal unit months (AUM)--the amount of forage that a cow and her calf can eat in 1 month. For most...

  • Pressures and Priorities in the National Budget. Wallace, L. T.; Breimyer, Harold F. // American Journal of Agricultural Economics;Dec70, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p656 

    Focuses on the budgetary process in the United States (U.S.) allocated for public programs in rural areas. Problems on the interdependencies of federal agencies; Goals of the U.S. Department of Agriculture for food allocation; Role of the U.S. Bureau of Budget in fiscal control.

  • President proposes 5 percent increase for USDA.  // Southwest Farm Press;2/12/2004, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports on the recommendation of the U.S. government for an increase in spending for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for fiscal year 2005 beginning October 2004. Statement from USDA secretary Ann Veneman about the budget; Budget appropriated for homeland security and food supply...

  • Observations on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Fiscal Year 1999 Performance Report and Fiscal Year 2001 Performance Plan: RCED-00-212R.  // GAO Reports;6/30/2000, p1 

    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) fiscal year (FY) 1999 performance report and FY 2001 performance plans required by the Government Performance and Results Act. GAO noted that: (1) according to its performance report, USDA met most of its...

  • LEGISLATIVE REPORT.  // Education Week;10/19/1983, Vol. 3 Issue 7, p14 

    The article reports developments on appropriations provided by the government for education in the U.S. Appropriations for impact aid and several other key programs would provide funds for the Education Department. The Department of the Interior and other agencies were provided 150 million...

  • An Improved Balanced Budget Amendment. Mcculloch, J. Huston // Independent Review;Fall2012, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p219 

    The article focuses on the need for balance budgeting to address the 15.2 trillion U.S. dollars national debt of the U.S. as of 2012. Representative Bob Goodlatte of Viriginia proposed a balanced budget amendment on November 28, 2011, which received bipartisan support but failed to reach the...

  • Nondefense R&D would take a hit in proposed FY 2004 budget.  // Issues in Science & Technology;Spring2003, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p23 

    Reports on the increased federal research and development budget for fiscal year 2004 proposed by U.S. President George W. Bush on February 3, 2003. Funding for defense and nondefense research and development; Budget for the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Science...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics