TITLE

Cetelem v Roust Holdings leaves tension over the court's powers to support arbitration

AUTHOR(S)
Reece, Ruper
PUB. DATE
October 2005
SOURCE
Lawyer;10/24/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 41, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments that the Court of Appeals decision in the Cetelem v Roust Holdings case in Great Britain, revealed a tension between the statutory grounds frequently invoked by parties seeking interim injunctions in support of international arbitrations. Reliance of a claimant on statutory provisions which are inconsistent with each other; Purpose of the court to preserve the evidence or assets.
ACCESSION #
18726665

 

Related Articles

  • Laurent v. Fort McKay First Nation.  // Canadian Native Law Reporter;2009, Vol. 3, p167 

    The article reports on the resolution of the legal case of Laurent v. Fort McKay First Nation. In the case the applicant sought an injunction enjoining the Fort McKay First Nation Council of Elders from holding a referendum recognizing their Election Code (the Code) as customary election law....

  • First-Party Litigation: Is it Worth the Trouble to Sue? Donahue, James F. // Risk Management (00355593);Nov85, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p40 

    This article addresses the advent of lawsuits by employers against their former management under the assumption that defendants' legal expenses will be paid under the directors' and officers' liability policy. Regarding the increased incidence of first-party litigation, the end result of a...

  • Court of Florence Issues International Intellectual Property Ruling.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q4, p1 

    The article discusses the intellectual property ruling of the Court of Florence in Italy regarding an Italian designer, an Italian company and a Hong Kong company. The court ruled on an application for injuctive relief filed by the designer against both companies for allegedly manufacturing and...

  • Interlocutory Injunctions: Revisiting the Three-Pronged Test. Groleau, Jean-Philippe // McGill Law Journal;Summer2008, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p269 

    The three-pronged test that courts in Canada and in other jurisdictions apply in considering applications for interlocutory injunctions is well established: the applicant must demonstrate that (1) there is a serious question to be tried, (2) he will suffer irreparable harm if denied the relief,...

  • Comment. Barrett, Donald P. // California Law Review;Dec47, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p545 

    Explores the federal injunctions against proceedings in state courts in the U.S. Outline of the judge-made exceptions; Indication of what trends are to be found in the cases; Discussion on the statutory exceptions; Examination on the possible effect of legislation being considered by the Congress.

  • The Injunction Against the Miners.  // New Republic;11/12/19, Vol. 20 Issue 258, p307 

    Discusses the decision of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer to give an injunction against the coal strike in the U.S. Citation of the Lever Act; Coverage and jurisdiction of the application of the Act; Assertion of the author that use of injunction in such a case is a violation of the labor...

  • Spam and Block Lists Update. Oriez, Charles // Information Executive;Jul/Aug2004, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p26 

    Optinrealbig, a Colorado-based organization identified by Spamhaus as the world's second most prolific spammer, sued the Spamcop database operators in Federal District Court in California seeking to bar them from forwarding spam complaints to various ISPs. After hearing arguments, Judge Saundra...

  • Defendant Not Entitled to Preliminary Injunction Halting Its Withdrawal Liability Payments.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p65 

    The article reports that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana has concluded that a company challenging a 1.2 million dollars withdrawal liability assessment by a multiemployer pension fund was not entitled to a preliminary injunction halting. The court balances the harm...

  • Sun, sea and silks. Andrews, Seamus // Lawyer;11/10/2008, Vol. 22 Issue 44, p34 

    The article stresses the effectiveness of the Caribbean legal systems in making the region an ideal destination for dispute resolution in 2008. The system's domicile and stability are two main reasons why disparate parties go to Caribbean rather than the Commercial Court or the Federal Courts of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics