Arnold & Porter to defend Da Vinci Code

Harris, Joanne
October 2005
Lawyer;10/24/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 41, p2
Trade Publication
Reports on the agreement of British law firms Arnold and Porter with Orchard Solicitors to represent authors Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh in their copyright infringement claim against Dan Brown, author of the book "The Da Vinci Code". Claim of the authors that Brown copied substantial material from their book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail"; Schedule of the preliminary hearing on liability.


Related Articles

  • Judge clears author of The Da Vinci Code.  // Christian Century;5/2/2006, Vol. 123 Issue 9, p16 

    The article reports on the ruling of the British High Court that author Dan Brown did not plagiarize and breach the copyright of the book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" in writing his novel "The Da Vinci Code." Authors Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh claimed that Brown lifted parts of...

  • THE DA VINCI LODE. Grose, Thomas K. // U.S. News & World Report;3/13/2006, Vol. 140 Issue 9, p50 

    The article reports on a copyright infringement lawsuit brought in Great Britain against Dan Brown, author of the novel "The Da Vinci Code." The suit was filed by Richard Leigh and Michael Baigent, authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," who charge that Brown took too much of their book in...

  • Mary Magdalen and the Kings of France. Haskins, Susan // History Today;Aug2006, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p38 

    The article criticizes The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln, and The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown. The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail uses the Gnostic texts of the Gospel of Mary and the Gospel of Philip. It also suggests that Jesus may have...

  • clips.  // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;3/14/2006, Vol. 393 Issue 27, p3 

    The article presents information on recent developments related to the entertainment industry of the U.S. "The Da Vinci Code" novelist Dan Brown took the witness stand at London's High Court and dismissed as "completely fanciful" claims that he stole the ideas of two authors, Michael Baigent and...

  • Arnold & Porter joins quest to clear Da Vinci Code author of plagiarism. Harris, Joanne // Lawyer;2/27/2006, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p12 

    The article reports that Arnold & Porter and London, England firm Orchard Solicitors will face each other in the British High Court as litigation over Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code" starts during week beginning February 27, 2006. The case involves plagiarism charges against Brown by ....

  • An Unholy Mess.  // People;3/13/2006, Vol. 65 Issue 10, p76 

    The article reports on the lawsuit brought on by authors Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh against Random House for copyright infringement and $150 million in damages. They allege that Dan Brown, author of "The Da Vinci Code," stole the plot of his story from their nonfiction book entitled "Holy...

  • Breaking the code. Jennings, Dick // Supply Management;5/25/2006, Vol. 11 Issue 11, p39 

    The article offers information about the proceedings of the recent court case concerning "The Da Vinci Code." The case emphasizes legal ownership and how the principle works. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors of the book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail," are protesting against the...

  • 'CODE' CASE APPEAL. Thomas, Archie // Daily Variety;7/12/2006, Vol. 292 Issue 6, p18 

    The article reports that historians Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh have filed an appeal in the British High Court after losing the plagiarism case they filed against Random House, the publisher of Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code." Baigent and Leigh claimed that Brown stole from their book...

  • 'CODE' AUTHOR REFUTES CLAIM. Zeitchik, Steven // Daily Variety;3/14/2006, Vol. 290 Issue 53, p2 

    The article reports on the refute of Dan Brown against the claims that he stole ideas from nonfiction tome "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, in his book "The Da Vinci Code." The publisher of Brown's book in Great Britain, Random House Inc. was sued by the two...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics