TITLE

TOTAL RECALL

AUTHOR(S)
DeGrosky, Michael T.
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Fire Chief;Sep/Oct2005 Supplement, Vol. 49, p24
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the use of appraisal of experience to improve performance by reproducing success and preventing recurrent errors in fire management. Improvement of deficient operations in the future; Aim to facilitate learning from combat training exercises; Provision of an avenue for feedback, a means of promoting evaluation. INSET: TIPS FOR CONDUCTING AARS.
ACCESSION #
18679776

 

Related Articles

  • Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation: A Technique that Works. Roberts, Gary E. // Public Personnel Management;Spring2003, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p89 

    Performance appraisal is one of the most complex and controversial human resource techniques. Participatory performance appraisal is an essential and proven attribute of an effective performance appraisal system. This article summarizes the conceptual foundation for participation including its...

  • Two Ways to Evaluate Your Performance Appraisal System. Kirkpatrick, Donald L. // Training & Development Journal;Aug84, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p38 

    Presents a survey method for evaluating an employee performance appraisal system. Measures of determining whether employees know what is expected of them; Need to make employees aware of their performance against the firm's expectations; Ways of helping employees improve their performance;...

  • Level pegging. Brown, Duncan; Dive, Brian // People Management;1/15/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p26 

    The article presents information on the revival job evaluation for employees in Great Britain. The latest job evaluation survey by British-based reward website e-reward reveals a picture of surprisingly robust health and expansion, rather than decay, in organisations employing a total of almost...

  • Assessing potential. Burbridge, Mark // Training Journal;Aug2008, p39 

    The article examines the thinking on assessment and offers guidance in how to best manage the process in Great Britain. It states that whether assessment is a tool used to assess external candidates or individuals aiming for promotion, it should at the very least provide a fair and reasonable...

  • Do you praise poor performers too much?  // Executive Leadership;Mar2013, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p4 

    The article presents a discussion of the need to provide honest appraisals of employees' performance, adapted from the blog "The 10 Elements of Positive Performance Management" by John Mattone.

  • Don't Mistake a Bull Market For Brains. Anderson, Dave // Credit Union Magazine;Jul2006, Vol. 72 Issue 7, p12 

    The article focuses on how managers rate the performance of their employees. Managers get the job done on the backs of the other people, by pushing, abusing, or intimidating to get results. They get results because they have created a culture of discipline or have become tyrants who impose...

  • 'Rank and Yank' Systems May Improve Workforce Performance, Study Finds.  // Community Banker;Apr2005, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p64 

    Presents the results of a study on the role of forced distribution ratings systems (FDRS) in improving workforce performance published in the periodical "Personnel Psychology." Advantages and disadvantages of implementing FDRS; Implications of the result of the study for employers.

  • How to conduct clear, effective staff evaluations. Capko, Judy // Urology Times;12/1/2008, Vol. 36 Issue 15, p14 

    The author discusses the methods in administering effective and concise evaluations for employees. Methods include a well-written and accurate job description, well-versed performance evaluation rating mechanism and report, and salary guidelines for different position. Inasmuch, it cites the...

  • Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Rater Training on Psychometric Error in Ratings. Ivancevich, John M. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Oct79, Vol. 64 Issue 5, p502 

    Sixty-six supervisory engineers were randomly assigned to (a) an intense training group, (b) a discussion group, or (c) a nontrained comparison group. The intense training group and discussion group supervisors received 14 hours of rater training designed to minimize halo and leniency error and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics