Urgent Colonoscopy for Evaluation and Management of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Green, Bryan T.; Rockey, Don C.; Portwood, G.; Tarnasky, Paul R.; Guarisco, Steve; Branch, Malcolm S.; Leung, Joseph; Jowell, Paul
November 2005
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Nov2005, Vol. 100 Issue 11, p2395
Academic Journal
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that early intervention in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) would improve outcomes and therefore conducted a prospective randomized study comparing urgent colonoscopy to standard care. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with LGIB without upper or anorectal bleeding sources were randomized to urgent purge preparation followed immediately by colonoscopy or a standard care algorithm based on angiographic intervention and expectant colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. A definite source of bleeding was found more often in urgent colonoscopy patients (diverticula, 13; angioectasia, 4; colitis, 4) than in the standard care group (diverticula, 8; colitis, 3) (the odds ratio for the difference among the groups was 2.6; 95% CI 1.1–6.2). In the urgent colonoscopy group, 17 patients received endoscopic therapy; in the standard care group, 10 patients had angiographic hemostasis. There was no difference in outcomes among the two groups—including: mortality 2% versus 4%, hospital stay 5.8 versus 6.6 days, ICU stay 1.8 versus 2.4 days, transfusion requirements 4.2 versus 5 units, early rebleeding 22% versus 30%, surgery 14% versus 12%, or late rebleeding 16% versus 14% (mean follow-up of 62 and 58 months). CONCLUSION: Although urgent colonoscopy identified a definite source of LGIB more often than a standard care algorithm based on angiography and expectant colonoscopy, the approaches are not significantly different with regard to important outcomes. Thus, decisions concerning care for patients with acute LGIB should be based on individual experience and local expertise.


Related Articles

  • The Utility of Urgent Colonoscopy in the Evaluation of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: A 2-Year Experience From a Single Center. Angtuaco, Terence L.; Reddy, Sanjay K.; Drapkin, Sol; Harrell, Laura E.; Howden, Colin W. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun2001, Vol. 96 Issue 6, p1782 

    OBJECTIVE: Urgent colonoscopy is often recommended to evaluate acute rectal bleeding. However, it may not identify a source because of blood in the lumen or inadequate preparation. Our aim was to determine the utility of urgent colonoscopy as the initial test for acute rectal bleeding. METHODS:...

  • Can Computed Tomographic Colonography Become a "Good" Screening Test? Imperiale, Thomas F. // Annals of Internal Medicine;4/19/2005, Vol. 142 Issue 8, p669 

    The article cites that a recent study of computed tomographic colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") without bowel preparation reported a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92% for polyps 8 mm or larger. Computed tomographic colonography may be getting closer to becoming a "good" screening...

  • Testing the construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters. Fayez, Raad; Feldman, Liane S.; Kaneva, Pepa; Fried, Gerald M. // Surgical Endoscopy;May2010, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p1060 

    The use of simulation for competency assessment requires validation of the simulator’s performance metrics. This study evaluated whether the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality simulator metrics differentiate gastrointestinal endoscopists with varying clinical experience (known-groups...

  • Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Morgan, Jenna; Thomas, Kathryn; Braungart, Sarah; Nelson, Richard // Techniques in Coloproctology;Aug2013, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p353 

    Due to the increasing demand for colonoscopy, devices to advance examination techniques are highly sought after. Several studies have examined the use of a transparent cap attached to the tip of the colonoscope, but the data are inconsistent. The aim of our study was to establish whether...

  • Bedside colonoscopy for critically ill patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Chun-Che Lin; Yi-Chia Lee; Huei Lee; Jaw-Town Lin; Wei-Chi Ho; Tan-Hsia Chen; Hsiu-Po Wang // Intensive Care Medicine;May2005, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p743 

    Objective:To determine the clinical impact of bedside colonoscopy for critically ill patients with acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.Design and setting:A 3-year retrospective analysis (chart review). Medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 1,312-bed tertiary-care center in...

  • Detection of Bleeding Due to Small Bowel Cholesterol Emboli Using Helical CT Examination in Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin. Miller, Frank H.; Kline, Mitchell J.; Vanagunas, Arvydas D. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec1999, Vol. 94 Issue 12, p3623 

    Chronic, intermittent GI bleeding is defined as obscure when routine diagnostic examinations of the GI tract, including barium and endoscopic studies, fail to reveal the cause of bleeding. Our patient had significant bleeding and extensive evaluation including upper endoscopy, small bowel...

  • AIR CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMA VERSUS COLONOSCOPY: THE DEBATE CONTINUES. Noyer, Charles; Simon, Douglas; Johnson, David A.; Cattau Jr., Edward L. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Sep1991, Vol. 86 Issue 9, p1274 

    Comments on a study which examined the cost effectiveness and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy with air contrast barium enema in patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Drawbacks of the study; Issues in considering the choice between endoscopic and...

  • Colonoscopic Perforation and Bleeding of the Colon Can Be Treated Safely Without Surgery. Ker, Tim S.; Wasserberg, Nir; Beart, Robert W. // American Surgeon;Oct2004, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p922 

    The incidence of colonoscopic perforation of colon is about 0.3 per cent. The incidence of colonoscopic bleeding is about 0.6 per cent. Many of those patients undergo unnecessary operations. In order to assess the outcome of nonoperative management of those patients with postcolonoscopic...

  • Clinical Experiences with Colonoscopy. Dagradi, Angelo E.; Alaama, Abdulmouti; Ruiz, Ricardo // American Journal of Gastroenterology;May1975, Vol. 63 Issue 5, p408 

    Our experiences with 100 colonoscopic examinations are described. The clinical value of the procedure is outlined and the minimal degree of attendant morbidity, when performed by a competent endoscopist, are emphasized. The indications and contraindications for this relatively recently devised...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics