Sue. And Be Sued

Abdulaziz, Sam K.
October 2005
Reeves Journal: Plumbing, Heating, Cooling;Oct2005, Vol. 85 Issue 10, p8
Trade Publication
Discusses the difference of the legal concepts, standing to sue and capacity to sue. Definitions of standing to sue and capacity; Common situations with regard to the lack of capacity to sue; Overview of a case wherein a corporation was examined if it could defend itself.


Related Articles

  • Responding to a claim. Booth, Richard; Walker, Peter // Credit Management;Feb2008, p18 

    The article provides information on the practical steps that companies in Great Britain had to take in a case proceedings. According to the author, the reactions and actions taken by a company when issued a Claim Form is important in determining its survival during the litigation process. He...

  • Media lawyers predict changes to reputation management in wake of Leveson. Chadderton, Sam // Lawyer (Online Edition);12/3/2012, p15 

    The article reports that reputation management practices will have to change focus if recommendations are imposed. They claim that the establishment of a low-cost arbitration system to solve civil disputes such as libel will drastically reduce the number of large money-spinning pieces of litigation.

  • Underclaiming and Overclaiming. Pandya, Sachin S.; Siegelman, Peter // Law & Social Inquiry;Fall2013, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p836 

    Arguments that we have too much litigation (overclaiming) or too little (underclaiming) cannot be valid without estimating how many of the undecided claims that are brought (actual claims) or not brought (potential claims) have or lack legal merit. We identify the basic conceptual structure of...

  • Delegarea atribuÅ£iilor de reprezentare către sucursala unei societăţi. AcÅ£iune în justiÅ£ie formulată de sucursală. Capacitatea procesuală de folosinţă.  // Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Romana de Jurisprudenta;2014, Issue 1, p58 

    In compliance with art. 43 of the Law no. 31/1990, the branches are dismem-berments without legal personality, of the companies registered under the law, they can stand trial, according to art. 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, if authorized in the manner provided for by laws or the regulations...

  • When should you sue in small-claims court?  // Consumer Reports Money Adviser;Sep2006, Vol. 3 Issue 9, p8 

    The article discusses when an individual should sue in small-claims court. It cites some alternatives to suing in small-claims court. It presents tips in making sure a claim on annoyance caused by noisy domestic animals can be made. It enumerates the things complainants should expect when filing...

  • CHAPTER EIGHT: PLEADING. Kelly, Zachary A. // Our Court System;1999, p37 

    This chapter focuses on the civil procedure of pleading, in which both the plaintiff and defendant send papers to the court. A pleading gives facts and asks for actions, and also tells the point of view of the person who sent it. Pleadings are sent from the court to other people in the case,...

  • RETHINKING EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. Dodson, Scott // Northwestern University Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 106 Issue 1, p377 

    This short Essay seeks to rationalize the "extraordinary circumstances" requirement of Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under the Ackermann rule, courts have held that any extraordinary circumstances must not have been caused by the movant's own litigation conduct. I argue...

  • Madera Supervisors under fire on funding. Sullivan, Michael // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;8/3/2007, Issue 323744, p5 

    The article reports on the lawsuit faced by the Madera County Board of Supervisors in California. The lawsuit was filed for the alleged failure of the board to comply with the Ralph Brown Act. The act requires governmental entities to operate in the open. It has been reported that the board...

  • El principio dispositivo y su influencia en la determinación del objeto del proceso en el proceso civil chileno. AGUIRREZABAL GRÜNSTEIN, MAITE // Revista de Derecho Privado;2017, Issue 32, p423 

    This paper analyzes the dispositive principle and its role in determining the object of the process, according to the prohibition of mutatio libelli as a rule of protection of the rights of defense of the parties.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics