TITLE

Backward, Christian Soldiers!

AUTHOR(S)
Andersen, Kurt
PUB. DATE
October 2005
SOURCE
New York;10/17/2005, Vol. 38 Issue 36, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Relates the author's perspective on the concept of intelligent design. Impact of intelligent design on the theory of religion on evolution; Narration of the author on the concept of intelligent design, in reference to the teachings of the Dover Area School District in Pennsylvania; Description given by the author to the believers of intelligent design.
ACCESSION #
18600952

 

Related Articles

  • Who Designed That? McIver, Tom // Skeptic;2007, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p60 

    The article shares the author's insights on creationism and intelligent design (ID). The author cites that postulating an evolving designer would eliminate annoying problems for creationists, including the existence of species competition and extinction. He adds that evolution can be accepted...

  • Intelligent Design and Hurricane Katrina. Lea, Gary W. // Skeptic;2006, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p16 

    The article focuses on the proposition of some people on intelligent design as a replacement for a supplementary mechanism to evolution. When it comes to natural disasters, intelligent designers at a micro level are found to be uninterested to those fine-tuned creations at a macro level. While...

  • The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov, Vladimir // Nature;10/21/2004, Vol. 431 Issue 7011, p897 

    Comments on the article about intelligent design, published in the 2004 issue of the periodical "Nature". Suggestion that getting an intelligent-design paper into a peer-reviewed journal is an achievement for creationism; Failure of the article to present new arguments; Rampant proliferation of...

  • Designed for Controversy: the Religious Right's New Creationism. Boston, Rob // Humanist;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p35 

    This article focuses on the controversy over the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in U.S. schools. The article wonders what the court's ruling would be on the first legal challenge to intelligent design. Some arguments raised against teaching intelligent design in schools are...

  • What Makes a Theory Testable, or Is Intelligent Design Less Scientific Than String Theory? Ehrlich, Robert // Physics in Perspective;Mar2006, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p83 

    I compare the theory of intelligent design to string theory to see on what basis, if any, only the former can be justifiably excluded as being scientific.We shall see that the classic criterion of testability or falsifiability is sometimes not so straightforward, and that there are other...

  • Intelligent Designers Tested in Pennsylvania. Miller, Kenneth M. // Discover;Jan2006, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p71 

    The article focuses on an intelligent design theory championed by opponents of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution in Dover, Pennsylvania. Intelligent design lacks certain basics as a scientific theory. One requirement of science is that it makes specific predictions which can be tested in a...

  • Intelligent Design: Scientific Theory or Religious Conviction? Greenawalt, Kent // Journal of Church & State;Spring2003, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p237 

    Analyzes the religious and scientific aspects of the theory of intelligent design. Comparison between Darwin's evolution theory and the creation theory; Evidence which support the theory; Inferences of intelligent design theory; Issues on teaching religion.

  • THE SECULARITY OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN. Curtis, Finbarr // Hedgehog Review;Summer2011, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p68 

    An essay on legal or scientific argument related to intelligent design (ID). It focuses on the implications of equal time rhetoric for the secularity of American political institutions. It explores how ID proponents invoke liberal virtues of tolerance and intellectual freedom. Meanwhile, it...

  • Religion, Science, and Explanation. Dawes, Gregory W. // Ars Disputandi (AD);2012, Vol. 12, p19 

    A recent legal ruling in the United States regarding 'intelligent design' (ID) argued that ID is not science because it invokes a supernatural agent. It therefore cannot be taught in public schools. But the important philosophical question is not whether ID invokes a supernatural agent; it is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics