TITLE

United States of America and Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians vs. Orr Water Ditch Company

PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Native American Law Digest;Feb2005, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the views of the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the District Court's decision of the U.S. related to the lawsuit, "United States of America and Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians vs. Orr Water Ditch Co.," regarding the rights of Indians related to water use. The city of Fallon and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District appealed against the state engineer's decision of invoking Nev.Rev.State. 533.450(5), which allows a party to obtain an automatic stay of the engineer's ruling, to the Federal District Court. The court held that the controversy over applicability of Nev.Rev.State 533.450(5) was capable of repetition and shows that the appeals should be considered.
ACCESSION #
18503753

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court Orders DOJ Review in Water Wars Case. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;3/5/2014, Vol. 123 Issue 34070, p1 

    The article focuses on the about 20 year old Georgia's water rights dispute in which the U.S Supreme Court ordered for the review of water control manuals by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers. It reveals that in previous hearing, Georgia refused to share the water of...

  • Georgia Takes Corps to Court Over Water Rights. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;11/10/2014, Vol. 1 Issue 34208, p1 

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Nov. 3 that Florida can proceed with its suit against Georgia over fresh water rights.

  • Justice for All?: The Supreme Court's Denial of pro se Petitions for Certiorari. Smith, Kevin H. // Albany Law Review;1999, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p381 

    Focuses on issues surrounding the United States Supreme Court's essentially complete denial of pro se paid civil petitions for certiorari. Function of the Supreme Court within the American legal and political systems; Factors which influence the court's certiorari decision-making process; Legal...

  • Lost in translation: Civic journalism's applicability to newspaper coverage of the U.S. Supreme... Jamieson, Paul W. // Communications & the Law;Mar1998, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1 

    Presents information on issues pertaining to disputes over the coverage of the United States Supreme Court decision-making process of cases. Effects the disputes had on lower courts and high-ranking officials in Congress and the executive branch in relation to this topic; Explaination of how...

  • Final cases will tell High Court's leanings. Marquand, Robert // Christian Science Monitor;6/28/95, Vol. 87 Issue 149, p4 

    Focuses on the expected rulings of the Supreme Court on five cases clarifying race, religion and environmental issues on the last day for rulings in the term which ends on June 29, 1995. Speculations on the expected rulings of the court on some controversial cases.

  • High court agrees to decide if ERISA preempts state tax. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;11/04/96, Vol. 100 Issue 45, p55 

    Presents information on the agreement of the United States' Supreme Court to decide whether a state tax imposed on the income of a health care facility run by an employee benefit plan is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Information on the case DeBuono vs. NYSA-ILA...

  • Membership change and voting change: An analysis of the Rehnquist... Hensley, Thomas R.; Smith, Christopher E. // Political Research Quarterly;Dec95, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p837 

    Examines the collective voting behavior of the United States Supreme Court in civil rights and liberties decisions for the 1986-1987 through the 1991-1992 terms. Goal to determine if the Court has become significantly more conservative and the reasons for changes if any; Liberalism of the...

  • Come first Monday in October, banking has a date in court. Cocheo, Steve // ABA Banking Journal;Oct95, Vol. 87 Issue 10, p7 

    Presents the listings of the United States Supreme Court cases which was compiled with the assistance of Michael Crotty, ABA's deputy general counsel for litigation. Return of the US Supreme Court to business in October, 1995; Disclosure of examination reports; Insurance sales; Bankruptcy...

  • Supreme Court rules against cellular-phone privacy. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;5/28/2001, Vol. 20 Issue 22, p14 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court in a ruling in May 2001 upheld that restricting the broadcasting or publication of an illegally intercepted cellular telephone conversation violated the First Amendment because the contents of the call were of public significance. Reaction of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics