TITLE

Quantifying the Effect of Compression Hearing Aid Release Time on Speech Acoustics and Intelligibility

AUTHOR(S)
Jenstad, Lorienne M.; Souza, Pamela E.
PUB. DATE
June 2005
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Jun2005, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p651
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Compression hearing aids have the inherent, and often adjustable, feature of release time from compression. Research to date does not provide a consensus on how to choose or set release time. The current study had 2 purposes: (a) a comprehensive evaluation of the acoustic effects of release time for a single-channel compression system in quiet and (b) an evaluation of the relation between the acoustic changes and speech recognition. The release times under study were 12, 100, and 800 ms. All of the stimuli were VC syllables from the Nonsense Syllable Task spoken by a female talker. The stimuli were processed through a hearing aid simulator at 3 input levels. Two acoustic measures were made on individual syllables: the envelope-difference index and CV ratio. These measurements allowed for quantification of the short-term amplitude characteristics of the speech signal and the changes to these amplitude characteristics caused by compression. The acoustic analyses revealed statistically significant effects among the 3 release times. The size of the effect was dependent on characteristics of the phoneme. Twelve listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested for their speech recognition for the same stimuli. Although release time for this single-channel, 3:1 compression ratio system did not directly predict overall intelligibility for these nonsense syllables in quiet, the acoustic measurements reflecting the changes due to release time were significant predictors of phoneme recognition. Increased temporal-envelope distortion was predictive of reduced recognition for some individual phonemes, which is consistent with previous research on the importance of relative amplitude as a cue to syllable recognition for some phonemes.
ACCESSION #
18429169

 

Related Articles

  • Benefit of Wearing a Hearing Aid on the Unimplanted Ear in Adult Users of a Cochlear Implant. Dunn, Camille C.; Tyler, Richard S.; Witt, Shelley A. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Jun2005, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p668 

    The purpose of this investigation was to document performance of participants wearing a cochlear implant and hearing aid in opposite ears on speech-perception and localization tests. Twelve individuals who wore a cochlear implant and a hearing aid on contralateral ears were tested on their...

  • They Say "I Can't Hear in Noise," We Say "Say the Word Base". Tecca, John E. // Audiology Today;Nov/Dec2015, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p10 

    No abstract available.

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR. Lindley, George // Audiology Today;Nov/Dec2015, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p13 

    No abstract available.

  • Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors.  // Noise & Vibration Worldwide;Jul2009, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p38 

    The article focuses on the findings of a study concerning the discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors. The study examines the capacity of 25 hearing-impaired and eight normal-hearing listeners to discriminate between release time constants used for compression in...

  • Hearing Aids and Music. Chasin, Marshall; Russo, Frank A. // Trends in Amplification;2004, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p35 

    Discusses music perception in hearing aids. Differences between speech and music for hearing aids; Parameters in music; Information on hearing aid parameters.

  • Central auditory system plasticity and aural rehabilitation of adults. Neuman, Arlene C. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;Jul/Aug2005 Supplement 2, Vol. 42, p169 

    Until recently, researchers used behavioral measures of identification and discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli to assess the effects of auditory deprivation, enhancement, and training. Recent advances in our ability to measure electrical activity in the auditory system in response to...

  • They Say "I Can't Hear in Noise," We Say "Say the Word Base". LINDLEY, GEORGE // Audiology Today;Jul/Aug2015, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p44 

    No abstract available.

  • Digital Hearing in Today's World.  // Caribbean Business;9/22/2005, Vol. 33 Issue 37, pH13 

    Reports on the advancement of the hearing aids technology for the hearing impaired. Control of the sound stimulus electronically; Improvement of perception of high-frequency sounds resulting from wide dynamic-range microphones and receivers; Inclusion of wireless communication with constant...

  • Mind the Ports! The Effect of Severe Microphone Inlet Occlusion. Schweitzer, Christopher // Hearing Products Report;Aug2008, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p26 

    The article focuses on the effect of the severe microphone inlet occlusion on the directional hearing aids. A case study has been conducted to determine the values of the occlusion and the importance of the good maintenance of the microphone port integrity. It shows that the severe occlusion of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics