TITLE

Airline costs to mount after ECJ judge ruling

AUTHOR(S)
Harris, Joanne
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Lawyer;9/19/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 36, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the European Court of Justice has ruled in September 2005, that airlines are liable for compensating passengers in case of any delay, no matter what the circumstances. Case background; Implications for the airline industry.
ACCESSION #
18405326

 

Related Articles

  • EC REGULATION 261/2004: A CASE OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES? Barham, Sue // Travel Law Quarterly;Mar2009, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p23 

    This article examines the recent judgment of the European Court of Justice ('ECJ') in the case of Friederike Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia (22 December 2008) which analysed - many would say inadequately - the vexed question of when an airline is able to avoid the obligation to compensate...

  • United keeps grip on O'Hare gates. Johnsson, Julie // Crain's Chicago Business;8/7/2006, Vol. 29 Issue 32, p3 

    The article focuses on a court decision concerned with the United Airlines and O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Illinois. A Bankruptcy Court had ruled that United still has exclusive rights to its gates at O'Hare. The decision has turned as a blow to the city of Chicago.

  • TUI seeks damages after airport victory. Williamson, Emily // Travel Weekly: The Choice of Travel Professionals;5/31/2004, Issue 1720, p5 

    Tui-owned Coventry Airport may sue Warwick District Council after its legal bid to close the airport's temporary passenger terminal was thrown out of court. Warwick District Council took the airport to court to try to get a hearing for an injunction to stop the airport using the terminal, which...

  • The ups and downs of ATOL. Skuse, Ian // Business Travel World;May2006, p52 

    The article discusses the lawsuit concerning issues related to the use of air travel organizers' license (ATOL) in Great Britain. The uncertainty caused by the British High Court ruling that overturned the Civil Aviation Authority's Guidance Note 26 has led to some degree of confusion. At the...

  • FRESH TURBULENCE.  // Buying Business Travel;Jul/Aug2012, Issue 57, p93 

    The author discusses the impact of a European Court decision on passenger compensation on airlines' fortunes. Air passenger duty (APD) is a tax in Great Britain that distorts competition, particularly for carriers operating out of Great Britain airports or with a British hub. Willie Walsh, the...

  • Impending change for EU airport slot rules.  // Air Cargo World;Dec2012/Jan2013, Vol. 102 Issue 11, p8 

    The article reports that a new agreement reached during the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council may convert a 1993 European Union rule into law, which introduced slot regulations at airports all over Europe. The rule, if converted into law, will allow airport officials to sell and...

  • Taking the next step.  // Airline Business;Jun2007, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p90 

    The author reflects on the second-stage of Open Skies negotiations between the U.S. and the European Union (EU). He says it is accurate to say that the U.S. has achieved the goal of traditional Open Skies with all the member states of the EU, but that is a huge step forward. He believes...

  • LAS POSIBILIDADES DE REVISAR SENTENCIAS JUDICIALES FIRMES POR INFRACCIÓN DEL DERECHO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA. COMELLA, VÍCTOR FERRERES // Actualidad Juridica (1578-956X);2010, Issue 25, p75 

    One of the most interesting problems that the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has had to deal with in the recent years concerns the conditions under which it is possible to revise national administrative or judicial decisions that violate European Union law. In particular, what are...

  • Israel. Liability for airport injury.  // Travel Law Quarterly;Sep2010, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p174 

    The article reports on the ruling by the Kiryat Gat Magistrates Court in Israel on the case, Tamar Lamberg versus the Airport Authority, in which a physical injury claim was filed against the Airport Authority. The court ruled that the Airport Authority should have taken steps to prevent...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics