TITLE

Alabama toughens property protection

AUTHOR(S)
Hollis, Paul L.
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Southeast Farm Press;9/21/2005, Vol. 32 Issue 22, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the passage of a bill that protects private property rights in Alabama. Citation of a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that could have given cities wide power to condemn property for private development in order to generate tax revenue; Impact of a call to action from the Alabama Farmers Federation on the passage of the bill; Provisions of the bill.
ACCESSION #
18364473

 

Related Articles

  • United States v. Butler (1936).  // Constitution & the Nation: The Regulatory State, 1890-1945;2003, Vol. 24, p116 

    The article focuses on the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Agricultural Adjustment Act which attempt to persuade farmers to limit taxation. The court stated that the tax can only be sustained by ignoring the avowed purpose and operation of the act. In addition, the tax can...

  • Why Arizona's Immigration Law Debate Matters. Swapan, Ashfaque // India -- West;7/6/2012, Vol. 37 Issue 33, pA8 

    The author discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court over the legislative bill related to immigration in Arizona. The decision overruled the sections of the law that made it a state offence for immigrants not to be carrying documents related to their lawful presence in the country and...

  • Mississippi Farmer Takes On Roundup Ready Patent. Franz, Neil // Chemical Week;12/4/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 47, p14 

    Reports on a plan by a Mississippi farmer to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Missouri appeals court decision as of December 4, 2002. Overview of the court ruling; Action taken by the Supreme Court.

  • Supreme Court says yes to flow control. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;12/24/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 17, p12 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has said that the Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Authority in New York could require haulers to take municipal solid waste to the authority's facilities. Chief Justice John Roberts said that courts are allowed to apply a balancing test to know whether...

  • ACLU Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Florida Adoption Ban Case. Norris, Michelle // Lesbian News;Nov2004, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p12 

    Provides information on a request filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its challenge to Florida's ban on adoptions by lesbian and gay men on October 1, 2004. Overview of the decision of the federal Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to uphold...

  • Another Fine Mess.  // Billboard;7/19/2003, Vol. 115 Issue 29, p10 

    Highlights the April 2003 ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson that the Morpheus and Grokster file-sharing networks were legal. Policy launched by the Recording Industry Association of America against the file-sharing services; Significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's 1984...

  • Eminent Domain May Hit Home for One Justice. Hemphill, Allen Polk // San Diego Business Journal;7/11/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 28, p42 

    Comments on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court over the case "Kelo vs. the city of New London, Connecticut" in relevance to the interpretation of the Constitution concerning eminent domain. Potential negative impact of the ruling to citizens; Influence of the ruling to benefit citizens by...

  • Encinitas Takes on the Supreme Court. Broderick, Pat // San Diego Business Journal;7/25/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 30, p1 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling over eminent domain in Encinitas, California. Impact of the ruling on private property rights of individuals in the city; Indication of the ruling that local government have the right to take land and in turn, give it to private developers for the purpose...

  • TAKINGS CLAUSE--TAKE THREE. Callies, David L. // ABA Journal;Nov87, Vol. 73 Issue 11, p48 

    Focuses on U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on cases dealing with private property rights and local land-use regulation under the Fifth Amendment. Taking issue in the case, Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis; Appropriateness of compensation for total regulatory takings; Decision...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics