TITLE

Private Equity Without Fund Management Fees?

AUTHOR(S)
Hahn, Avital Louria
PUB. DATE
May 2005
SOURCE
Investment Management Weekly;5/16/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 19, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the decision of private equity firm Bard Capital Partners to collect fund management fees from actual investments and not on uncommitted funds. Disadvantages of the business model used by the equity firm; Main industrial holding of the firm; Approach used by the firm to address problems related to sourcing deals.
ACCESSION #
18316088

 

Related Articles

  • PE Without Fund Management Fees? Hahn, Avital Louria // Investment Dealers' Digest;5/9/2005, Vol. 71 Issue 18, p10 

    Reports on the strategy of Bard Capital Partners LLC to find an investment and ask investors for the money to buy the investment in the U.S. Involvement of the company's principals in the day-to-day running of their middle-market industrial companies; Usefulness of the strategy in the private...

  • Check portfolio management fees. Weaver, Peter // Nation's Business;Jan95, Vol. 83 Issue 1, p65 

    Focuses on investment portfolio management fees. Types of fees; Financial planner's fee; Fees charged by mutual funds and insurance companies; Transfer of assets to another investment management company.

  • Demografie als Investmentchance.  // Die Bank;jan2012, Issue 1, p6 

    The article discusses the professional competence of fund managers as an important factor for the success of private equities in comparison to the stock market.

  • eFront Launches Portfolio Monitoring and Analysis Tool. Safane, Jake // Global Custodian News;2014, p71 

    The article reports that the FrontPM, which is a portfolio monitoring and analysis tool for direct investment managers in the alternatives industry, was launched by the private equity software solutions provider eFront.

  • Fretting over fee setups.  // Pensions & Investments;10/19/1998, Vol. 26 Issue 21, p128 

    Examines the development of performance-based fees for pension fund management firms in the United States. Traditional flat percentage of assets managed; Measurement of returns; Measurement of performance; Top 25 defined benefit funds by growth rate; Top 25 defined contribution funds by growth...

  • Disparities in local council pension fund fees. Silvera, Ian // Employee Benefits;May2013, p4 

    The article offers information on the disparities in the local council pension fund fees. It states that a report revealed that some councils were paying three times as much as other British funds of the same size. It mentions that the quarter of funds with the most expensive investment...

  • Pressure rises for greater disclosure of fees and costs.  // EG: Estates Gazette;4/9/2005, Issue 514, p45 

    Reports on a warning issued to the fund management industry concerning growing pressure to increase the disclosure of fees and costs. Reason for the complexity of the disclosure; Lack of consistency of approach on disclosure; Efforts to establish an agreed cost basis.

  • Australian funds paying through the nose.  // Super Review;Oct2004, Vol. 18 Issue 9, p5 

    Presents a survey conducted by Watson Wyatt Research showing the payment of investment management fees in Australia. Comparison of Australian funds payment with European counterparts; Factors causing upward pressure on fee structures; Development and changes related to fee rate.

  • 'Unhealthy focus' on fee cutting.  // Fund Strategy;3/5/2012, p8 

    The article discusses issues related to the implementation of Retail Distribution Review (RDR) in Great Britain. It has been stated that Schroders has aligned the initial charges across its fund range at 3.25% ahead of the implementation of the RDR, but there are growing concerns that the debate...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics