TITLE

Putnam Whistleblower Wants Cut of the Action

AUTHOR(S)
Burke, Kevin
PUB. DATE
July 2005
SOURCE
Investment Management Weekly;7/11/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 27, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on a civil lawsuit filed by Peter Scannell, a resident of Weymouth, Massachusetts, against Massachusetts attorney general Thomas Reilly in an attempt to secure a reward for his role in exposing the alleged trading abuses of Putnam Investments in 2005. Amount of the reward trying to collect by Scannell under the False Claims Act of the state; Provisions of the False Claims Act; Remarks from David Kerrigan, government bureau chief of Reilly, on the revelations made by Scannell.
ACCESSION #
18300015

 

Related Articles

  • Putnam Whistleblower Wants His Cut. Burke, Kevin // Money Management Executive;7/11/2005, Vol. 13 Issue 27, p1 

    The article presents information about a court case related to a scandal in mutual fund trading. Peter Scannell, a Weymouth, Massachusetts resident has filed a civil lawsuit in the Suffolk County Superior Court against Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly in an attempt to secure an...

  • Putnam wins DALBAR honor. Star, Marlene Givant; Philip, Christine // Pensions & Investments;2/6/1995, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p48 

    Reports that Putnam Investments has been awarded the DALBAR Quality Tested Service Seal for the fifth consecutive year. Recognition of mutual fund companies' excellence in service to investors.

  • BOIL AND BUBBLE FUNDS IN TROUBLE. Carbonara, Peter // Money;Dec2003, Vol. 32 Issue 13, p136 

    Discusses how the investigation of the trading scandal at Putnam Investments began with a civil complaint from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. How a group of boilermakers in Queens participated in rapid trading activity that was looked down upon by Putnam; Consideration of how the...

  • MVAIC--"SPECIAL PROCEEDING"--TAXATION OF COSTS.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec1966, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p251 

    The article focuses on the decision of a U.S. court, given in the year 1966, in the lawsuit Douglas VP. MVAIC. The court decided that a court proceeding resulting in a denial of a permanent stay of arbitration after trial of issues as to whether there was physical contact and an accident within...

  • Judge dimisses portion of suit against Putnam. Williams, Terry // Pensions & Investments;5/4/1998, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p29 

    Presents information on a suit that was filed against Putnam Investments by former staff attorney, Edward A. H. Siedle. Information on when the suit was filed; Background information on the case; Why the suit was filed against the company; Judges' ruling in the case.

  • Funds 2: Pigs fly at Putnam. Feldman, Amy // Money;Mar2004, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p29 

    This article focuses on changes at Putnam Investments following a lawsuit by federal regulators. Nothing like a scandal to spur change. After being sued by regulators--and watching investors flee--Putnam Investments has moved to cut fees and improve shareholder disclosure. As we argued in our...

  • Objectively ranking managers gets tougher. Sortino, Frank // Pensions & Investments;5/3/2004, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p26 

    Eliot Spitzer has irrevocably transformed the future of manager selection in the U.S. His case against Putnam Investments Inc., Boston, destroyed the notion that hiring big name managers would insulate fiduciaries from legal action. Pension Research Institute has five risk manager selection...

  • Texas ERS Jump Starts Suit Against Putnam. Sorondo, Marc // Investment Management Weekly;10/31/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 41, p3 

    Reports on a lawsuit filed by the Texas Employees' Retirement System against Putnam Investments in 2005. Charges facing Putnam Investments under the suit; Arguments presented by the plan in the suit; Statement issued by Mary Jane Wardlow, a spokeswoman for the plan, regarding the suit.

  • GLAD files suit against Reilly over anti-gay referendum. Kiritsy, Laura // Bay Windows;10/11/2001, pN.PAG 

    Focuses on a lawsuit filed by Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) on October 3, 2001 asking the Supreme Judicial Court to overturn Attorney General Thomas Reilly's decision to certify anti-gay constitutional amendments. Aim of the Protection of Marriage amendments; Argument presented...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics