TITLE

Fraud Charges Fly In Legal Flap Over Charter Rebuild

AUTHOR(S)
Farrell, Mike
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Multichannel News;9/12/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 38, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information on a lawsuit filed by contractor Crown Fiber Communications Inc. against Charter Communications for failing to pay for rebuild contract for systems formerly owned by Marcus Cable of Alabama. Issuance of subpoenas to some cable network groups by Billy Ray Jones, former CEO of Crown Fiber; Overview of a counterclaim by Charter regarding the lawsuit; Details of the court's rulings on the lawsuit
ACCESSION #
18280579

 

Related Articles

  • Charter Settles $40 Million Fraud Claim. Farrell, Mike // Multichannel News;5/8/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 19, p22 

    The article reports on the decision of Charter Communications Inc. to settle its fraud lawsuit against Billy Ray Jones, the one-time owner of Crown Fiber Communications, a Georgia cable-construction firm. The charges Charter made against Jones are provided. According to depositions filed with...

  • May Broker Set Off Unpaid L&D Claim? Barrett, Colin // Traffic World;10/9/2006, Vol. 270 Issue 41, p38 

    The article offers advice regarding the settlement of countervailing debts. A Supreme Court decision has been cited, which ruled out that the common-law right of any creditor to apply the unappropriated monies of his debtor in extinguishment of the debts due to him. It was thus explained, that...

  • Charter: Feds Want Documents. Farrell, Mike // Multichannel News;8/19/2002, Vol. 23 Issue 33, p2 

    Reports on the subpoena from the U.S. grand jury to Charter Communications Inc. regarding the method of company in counting subscribers. Statement from senior vice president David Andersen of Charter on the issue; Request from the jury on the documents relating Charter's current and...

  • First Circuit Joins Ninth Circuit and District of Columbia Circuit in Ruling Medicare Overpayments Are Subject to Recoupment. Schondorf, Eric L. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article deals with the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to differentiate recoupment and setoff in a bankruptcy proceeding. In the case Holyoke Nursing Home Inc. v. Health Care Financing Administration, the First Circuit ruled that the Health Care Financing...

  • JOINT TORTFEASORS -- CONTRIBUTION UNINSURED MOTORIST CLAIM -- OREGON -- THREE-CAR ACCIDENT.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec1969, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p256 

    This article focuses on the judicial decision made by the Oregon court against the case "Welbourn v. Firemen's Insurance. Co., 458 P. 2d 167," concerning uninsured motorist claim contributions. In the case, the insured, who was injured in a collision involving two uninsured motorists, had...

  • Charter sues US West.  // Electronic Media;02/23/98, Vol. 17 Issue 9, p35 

    Reports that Charter Communications has filed a lawsuit against US West company on February 19, 1998 in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Montana. Reasons for the lawsuit.

  • Charter Seeks To Derail JPMorgan's Lawsuit. Kellerhals, Richard // High Yield Report;4/13/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 15, p6 

    The article reports on the plan of St. Louis-based cable television system provider Charter Communications to file a motion in a Manhattan court, seeking to derail a lawsuit brought by its agent bank, JPMorgan which calls for Charter to reinstate the terms on more than 10 billion U.S. dollars in...

  • Delinquent Contribution Claims Are Time-Barred.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;May2007, Vol. 41 Issue 5, p11 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the claims of the plaintiff multiemployer pension plan looking for delinquent contributions from the defendant employer are time-barred due to contribution inconsistencies. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan considers the...

  • Rulings Regarding Unpaid Contributions and Bankruptcy Proceedings Upheld.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Dec2008, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the defendant company, a participating employer in the plaintiff mutiemployer pension plans, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2002. It notes that the defendant's interpretation of the recoupment provision was concluded by the court as de novo correct....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics