Power Tool

Katz, Marisa
September 2005
New Republic;9/19/2005, Vol. 233 Issue 12, p14
Argues that liberals should fight Judge John Roberts's confirmation as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Suggestion that U.S. President George W. Bush will use his judicial nominations to make the Court more giving on the issue of presidential power; Ways in which Bush has tried to expand presidential powers in the context of the War on Terrorism; Increase of state secrets under Bush; Discussion of Roberts's stance on presidential power; Reference to an article titled "Article III Limits on Statutory Standing," by Roberts in the April 1993 issue of the "Duke Law Journal."


Related Articles

  • Uncle Sam. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;1/30/2006, Vol. 234 Issue 3, p20 

    The article looks at United States Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's stance on the subject of executive power. During the confirmation hearings, Alito misstated the law of presidential power. If Alito is confirmed, he could support those who insist that the president's power in the war on...

  • The President: Lightning Rod or King? Calabresi, Steven G.; Lindgren, James // Yale Law Journal;Sep2006, Vol. 115 Issue 9, p2611 

    The authors suggest that when political power is broadly examined, U.S. presidents and their parties have less power in the previously recognized. It is inferred that the president's formal powers under the Constitution are far narrow to justify the plug that surrounds presidential elections....

  • ROE V. ROVE. Hertzberg, Hendrik // New Yorker;8/1/2005, Vol. 81 Issue 22, p25 

    Deals with the nomination of federal appellate judge John Roberts by U.S. President George W. Bush as the replacement of Supreme Court Judge Sandra Day O'Connor on July 26, 2005. Career background of Roberts; Characteristics of Roberts; Factor that affected the attitude of Democrats toward the...

  • BEHIND The Smile. Boston, Rob // Church & State;Sep2005, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p4 

    Scrutinizes the career of United States President George W. Bush's Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts. Profile of Roberts; Responses of religious institutions to Bush's decision; Concerns of advocates of church-state separation; Implications of a legal brief written by Roberts and Kenneth W....

  • Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts: Why He Should Not Be Confirmed.  // Church & State;Sep2005, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p14 

    Argues that Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts is the wrong judge to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the United States Supreme Court. Claim that Roberts has been a loyal soldier in the far right political revolution throughout his career; Roberts' hostility toward civil liberties; His role in...

  • THE ART OF TESTIFYING. Malcolm, Janet // New Yorker;3/13/2006, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p70 

    The article comments on the confirmation hearings of judicial nominees at the U.S. Senate. The fast balls that the Democrats hurled were fueled largely by memorandums that John Roberts had written as a young attorney in the administration of former President Ronald Reagan advising his superiors...

  • Prayer OFFENSIVE? Boston, Rob // Church & State;Sep2005, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p8 

    Discusses the support of Religious Right groups to United States President George W. Bush's Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts. Television preacher Pat Robertson's "Operation Supreme Court Freedom," a prayer project intended to beseech God to replace justices with righteous judges;...

  • Honk If You Support The Separation Of Church And State. Lynn, Barry W. // Church & State;Sep2005, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p23 

    Discusses outcomes of the "Community of Faith and Unity," a religious gathering designed to present an alternative view of the courts regarding the appointment of United States Supreme Court judges. Speeches regarding the need to recognize the great diversity of religious opinion in the country...

  • Legal Theory. Lizza, Ryan // New Republic;8/1/2005, Vol. 233 Issue 5, p15 

    Comments on U.S. President George W. Bush's reasoning for nominating John Roberts for a position on the U.S. Supreme Court. Question on why Bush seemed to make a responsible decision in his selection of Roberts, despite his decision-making history; Observation that Bush did not resort to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics