Homeland Defense: Preliminary Observations on How Overseas and Domestic Missions Impact DOD Forces: GAO-03-677T

Decker, Raymond J.
April 2003
GAO Reports;4/29/2003, p1
Government Documents
The way in which the federal government views the defense of the United States has dramatically changed since September 11, 2001. Consequently, the Department of Defense (DOD) is adjusting its Cold War strategic focus (of defending against massed combat forces) to better encompass defense against the asymmetric threats that small terrorist cells represent to U.S. territory. GAO was asked to review DOD's participation in domestic missions. This testimony represents our preliminary work in response to the request. It addresses (1) the primary differences in military and nonmilitary missions; (2) how DOD evaluates requests for nonmilitary missions; (3) how the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act impacts DOD's nonmilitary missions; (4) whether current management organizations, plans, and forces are adequate to support DOD's domestic missions; and (5) the impact of overseas and domestic missions on military personnel tempo. GAO is making no recommendations in this testimony. DOD's military and nonmilitary missions differ in terms of roles, duration, discretion to accept or reject, and capabilities normally employed. DOD evaluates nonmilitary mission requests on the basis of legality, lethality, risk to DOD forces, the cost, the appropriateness of the mission, and the impact on military readiness. The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the direct use of federal military troops in domestic civilian law enforcement, except where authorized by the Constitution or Acts of Congress. Congress has expressly authorized the use of the military in certain situations such as to assist with drug interdiction or assist with terrorist incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. It is too early to assess the adequacy of DOD's new management organizations or plans but some forces may not be tailored for their domestic missions. DOD established an Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and U.S. Northern Command plan and execute domestic missions. U.S. Northern Command's plan for domestic military missions was developed before DOD officials had agreed on the nature of the threat. Forces are not adequately tailored for some domestic missions, and readiness could erode because of it. For example, Air Force fighter units deployed since September 11, 2001 to perform combat air patrols are unable to also perform required combat training. Overseas and domestic missions are stressing U.S. forces as measured in personnel tempo data. In September 2001, about 1,600 Air Force personnel had spent 220 to 365 days away from their homes over the previous year, but by December 2002 almost 22,100 Air Force personnel had been away that long. The Army reported similar increases. To prevent erosion in combat capabilities, DOD issued orders, known as stop loss, to involuntarily retain critical personnel.


Related Articles

  • NAVY ROLE IN IRREGULAR WARFARE AND COUNTERTERRORISM: BACKGROUND AND ISSUES FOR CONGRESS. O'Rourke, Ronald // International Journal of Terrorism & Political Hot Spots;2010, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p447 

    Statements from Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and other Department of Defense (DOD) officials suggest that the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) that is currently in progress may lead to an increased emphasis in future U.S. defense budgets on capabilities for conducting irregular warfare (IW)...

  • Thinking Outside the Tank. Simon, Steven; Stevenson, Jonathan // National Interest;Winter2004/2005, Issue 78, p90 

    Discusses the formulation of strategy and tactics in facing war situations by the U.S. Moral and political positions of U.S. policy makers on the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001; Gaps in the intellectual capabilities of the U.S. government in the 1990s; Involvement of academics in...

  • FREEDOM AND SECURITY AFTER SEPTEMBER 11. Dinh, Viet D. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2002, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p399 

    Assesses the implication of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the national defense and civil liberties in the U.S. Policy adopted by the U.S. Department of Defense on intelligence investigation and national security protection; Discussion on the safeguard to privileged communications;...

  • Misplaced Budget Priorities Contribute to Our Vulnerability. Moore, Stephen // Human Events;10/8/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 37, p4 

    Ponders on the national security in the United States, in line with the terrorist attacks on the country on September 11, 2001. Reasons for the failure of the military and intelligence system of the country; How to measure the military budget; Importance of reexamining how the Pentagon budget...

  • Escheatment in the Post-September 11 Environment: A Problem for the Credit Executive? Schaeffer, Mary; Blakeley, Scott // Business Credit;Feb2003, Vol. 105 Issue 2, p26 

    Focuses on the impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the financial costs for homeland security in the U.S. Introduction of the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act to unify the state statutory scheme of escheatment; Estimation of the property claims associated with the...

  • After the terrorist attack: Security is a competitive value. Davis, Stan // NACD Directorship;Dec2001, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p1 

    Addresses the issue of security as a competitive value following the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States. Implication of the value of security for economic and emotional recovery; Importance of security to customers' fears.

  • ALL THOSE LOOSE LIPS. Mundy, Alicia // Editor & Publisher;9/24/2001, Vol. 134 Issue 37, p22 

    Focuses on the dangers of censorship. Speculation of media experts about the impetus of voluntary or forced censorship on national security in light of the Terrorist Attack of the United States; Statements on public official revealing of secret information; Opposition of the media to censorship.

  • Liberty and Security--in defense of both.  // Consumer Comments;Fall2001, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p1 

    Reports on the challenges faced by the United States regarding the defense of civil liberty and national security following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the country.

  • Terrorist attack against the United States. Rangel, Charles B. // New York Amsterdam News;9/13/2001, Vol. 92 Issue 34, p13 

    Provides insights on the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States. Lack of cause to justify the deed; Actions the nation should take; Importance of ensuring national security; Need to maintain decency and commitment in reacting to the incident.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics