National Emergency Grants: Services to Dislocated Workers Hampered by Delays in Grant Awards, but Labor Is Initiating Actions to Improve Grant Award Process: GAO-04-222

November 2003
GAO Reports;11/14/2003, p1
Government Document
Between 2000 and 2002, almost 60,000 mass layoffs of 50 or more workers occurred resulting in nearly 7 million workers losing their jobs. The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 authorizes the Department of Labor to award national emergency grants to affected states and local areas to provide employment and training assistance to workers affected by major economic dislocations, such as plant closures, and major disasters, such as floods and hurricanes. Although national emergency grants are intended to be a timely response to unexpected events, questions arose during congressional hearings in April 2003 about whether national emergency grant funds were getting to state and local areas quickly enough to help workers when they needed it the most. WIA specifies separate funding streams for each of the act's main client groups--adults, youths, and dislocated workers--and requires the Secretary of Labor to reserve 20 percent of dislocated worker funds for national emergency grants, demonstrations, and technical assistance. States and local areas apply to the Secretary for national emergency grants when they need additional funds to assist dislocated workers. These include regular grants, which provide employment and training assistance to workers who lost their jobs due to layoffs and plant closings; disaster grants, which provide temporary employment to workers affected by natural disasters and other catastrophic events; and dual enrollment grants to provide supplemental assistance to workers who have been certified by Labor to receive services under the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of 2002. Workers eligible under dual enrollment grants are typically workers who have lost their jobs because of increased imports from, or shifts in production to, foreign countries. At least 85 percent of the Secretary's 20 percent funds must be used for national emergency grants, and these funds can only be awarded during the year the funds are allotted. From July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003, Labor used these funds to award over $614 million in national emergency grants to 46 states and the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Federated States of Micronesia. Because of the concern about whether national emergency grants were awarded to states and local areas quickly enough to provide services to workers when they are most needed, we were asked to (1) determine the length of time Labor takes to award national emergency grants, (2) determine the effect delays in grant awards have on the ability of states and local areas to provide workers with employment and training services, and (3) identify actions Labor is taking to improve the timeliness of grant awards. In summary, we found that Labor awards virtually all of the funds available each year for national emergency grants, but that it rarely awards regular national emergency grants within its goal of 30 days. Nearly 90 percent of regular grant awards took longer than 30 days, and about 46 percent took 90 days or more. For regular grants, which represent about 64 percent of the grants and 58 percent of the funds awarded between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2003, it took Labor an average of 92 days to send the notification of an award after receiving an application. The amount of time Labor took to award regular grants appeared to be related to the quarter in which the application was received. For example, regular grant applications received in the first-quarter of a program year averaged 111 days from the time the application was received to the time the grant was awarded, whereas applications received in the fourth-quarter averaged 58 days. Furthermore, nearly 60 percent of all regular grants were awarded in the fourth-quarter of the program year, representing nearly two-thirds of the regular grants funds awarded, and 40 percent during the final month, representing about one-half of the regular grant funds awarded. Labor took less time to award dual enrollment and disaster grants. Dual enrollment grants, which represent about one-third of the funds awarded, took an average of 20 days to award after the applications were received, and disaster grants, which represent less than 10 percent of the funds awarded, took an average of 48 days. Thirty-three of the 39 states that received at least one regular grant between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2003, said that the amount of time it takes to receive regular grant funds was a major problem. In fact, 25 of the states reported that because of the delays in receiving grant funds, they had to delay or deny services to dislocated workers. Twenty of these states reported that local areas had to delay training for dislocated workers because, while waiting for national emergency grant funds, they did not have funds available to enroll them in training. For example, in 1 state, workers were on waiting lists for 3 to 4 months before they received training. Officials in another state reported that a local area cancelled training for over 300 workers because of a delay in receiving grant funds. Labor has said it is taking steps to address the length of time it takes to approve and award national emergency grants. In particular, under proposed guidelines, Labor would commit to approving a grant application within 15 business days of receiving a complete application. Labor is also developing a Web-based, electronic system that would allow states to apply for grants on-line. The system is also intended to help Labor better manage the review process by automatically assigning applications to specific staff members, specifying the number of days that they have to complete their responsibilities, and tracking their completion dates. Labor expects that the new guidelines and electronic system will be finalized in December 2003. In addition, according to Labor officials, they are considering additional steps to enhance the award process, such as reviewing the entire grant award process and developing training for states and local areas on applying for national emergency grants. As part of our ongoing work, we will assess in more detail whether Labor's proposed actions are likely to improve the process for awarding national emergency grants.


Related Articles

  • Unemployment claims drop again this week. Becker, Bernie // Hill;3/18/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 38, p12 

    The article reports that according to the U.S. Department of Labor, unemployment claims fell from 401,000 to 385,000 in the week ending March 12, 2011.

  • Department of Labor report: unemployment rate sees sharp increase in the month of August.  // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;9/10/2001, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p10 

    Reports on the sharp increase of unemployment rate in the month of August 2001 according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Total rate of unemployment; Decline in nonfarm payroll employment; Decrease in the civilian labor force.

  • Should job seekers be less pessimistic?  // Westchester County Business Journal;10/20/2003, Vol. 42 Issue 42, p4 

    Focuses on the report of the U.S. Department of Labor concerning the status and number of unemployed people their chances for more job opportunities for the month of September 2003. Emphasis of the job market and the media on the addition and job increase on September 2003 since February of the...

  • (WORKFORCE) Recovery Act Offers 45-65 Grants from $2M-$5M Each.  // Community Health Funding Week;7/24/2009, p20 

    The article reports on the U.S. federal workforce grant, offered by the Labor Department. The funding is made available through American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009. The grant is aimed at supporting projects that provide training and placement services to help workers pursue careers...

  • Jobless claims drop.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);2/20/2009, Vol. 56 Issue 9, p10A 

    The article reports on the condition of jobless Americans in the U.S. in January 2009. According to the Labor Department, nearly five million continued to draw jobless benefits, while new requests exceeded 600,000. It also notes that the number of initial jobless benefit claims dropped to a...

  • Jobless Claims Dip 19,000 To 318,000 in Sept. 1 Week.  // Bond Buyer;9/7/2007, Vol. 361 Issue 32708, p2 

    The article reports on the decline of initial claims for state unemployment in the U.S. for the week ending September 1, 2007. The country's Labor Department reported that unemployment fell by 19,000 to 318,000 during the period following an upward revision of the previous week's initial...

  • Jobless Claims Up 4,000 To 307,000 in July 28 Week.  // Bond Buyer;8/3/2007, Vol. 361 Issue 32684, p2 

    The article reports on the increase of initial claims for state unemployment in the U.S. According to the Department of Labor, it rose from 4,000 to 307,000 as of July 28, 2007. The initial unadjusted claims fell to 15.4% while the level of continuing claims also dropped. The unemployment rate...

  • NEWS RELEASE.  // Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Employment Situation;Sep2014, p1 

    The article presents labor news briefs from the Department of Labor as of 2014. It mentions that the unemployment rate in September 2014 declined by 0.2 percentage point to 5.9 percent. It is reported that the number of unemployed persons decreased by 329,000 to 9.3 million. It mentions that the...

  • Jobless Claims Rise 17,000 To 551,000 in Week. Temple-West, Patrick // Investment Dealers' Digest;10/2/2009, Vol. 75 Issue 37, p12 

    The article offers information on the content of the report made by the U.S. Department of Labor, which states that initial jobless claims increased by 17,000 or 551,000 in the week ending September 26, 2009. It mentions that continuing claims have declined by 70,000 to 6.09 million for the week...


Read the Article

Other Topics