TITLE

GAO's Agency Protocols: GAO-05-35G

PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
GAO Reports;10/21/2004, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This document contains the updated protocols that govern the U.S. Government Accountability Office's (GAO) work with executive branch agencies. The protocols provide clearly defined and transparent policies and practices on how GAO interacts with agencies in performing its work. GAO supports the Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and strives to help improve the performance and ensure the accountability of the federal government for the benefit of the American people. Although our primary client is the Congress and we must maintain our independence from the entities that are the subject of our work, we seek to continue constructive working relationships with the executive branch. In all cases, we seek to conduct our work in a professional, objective, fact-based, nonpartisan, and nonideological manner, in order to help improve government.
ACCESSION #
18174984

 

Related Articles

  • Homeland Department an 'High Risk' List.  // Government Executive;Mar2003, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p10 

    Focuses on the federal agencies and programs added to the U.S. General Accounting Office's 2003 biennial list. Vulnerability of the Homeland Security Department to waste, fraud and mismanagement; Inclusion of federal disability programs in the list; Other areas included in the list; Programs...

  • GAO suggests merger of federal banking regulators. Rehn, Barbara A. // American Banker;11/27/1996, Vol. 161 Issue 228, p2 

    Reports on the United States General Accounting Office's (GAO) suggestion that federal banking regulators be merged. Study showing that the American bank oversight system is duplicative and uncoordinated; Consolidation of federal regulatory agencies.

  • Year-End Buying Binge Slows.  // Government Executive;Oct98, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p8 

    Focuses on the report of the United States General Accounting Office (GAO) regarding federal agencies' annual urge to spend money at the end of the fiscal year which was curtailed by budget cuts and procurement changes. Effects of improper spendings of agencies; Reasons for unreliable spending...

  • Strength in (Fewer) numbers. Ballard, Tanya N. // Government Executive;Nov2002, Vol. 34 Issue 15, p14 

    Focuses on the report of the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) regarding the performance of federal agencies' programs. Possible improvement in the programs following consolidation of their inspector general offices; Role of the 1978 Inspector General Act in creation of independent audit...

  • Appendix I: Summary of Agencies' Response to GAO Questionnaire on Civilian Acquisition Workforce Training.  // GAO Reports;4/16/2013, p26 

    An appendix is presented of summary of the U.S. federal agencies' response to questionnaire presented by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding civilian workforce training which includes the training budget, manager duties and dedicated staff.

  • Amtrak Problems. Wilner, Frank N. // Traffic World;7/3/2000, Vol. 263 Issue 1, p16 

    Focuses on the conclusions made by the U.S. general Accounting Office following an audit of Amtrak Corp.'s operations and business plan. Percentage increase of Amtrak's total costs above the rate of inflation; Lack of standards for the measurement of productivity; Need for a multi-year capital...

  • GAO: Outsource For Best Value. Gruber, Amelia // Government Executive;Mar2003, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p16 

    Focuses on the outsourcing plans of the U.S. General Accounting Office for government agencies. Characteristics of good outsourcing decisions; Changes proposed by the Office of Management and Budget for federal outsourcing; Views of Comptroller General David Walker on the proposed changes.

  • Assessing the Reliability of Computer-Processed Data: GAO-03-273G.  // GAO Reports;10/1/2002, p1 

    GAO published a guide to assist its auditing staff in ensuring the reliability of computer-based data. The guidance provides a flexible, risk-based framework for data reliability assessments that can be geared to the specific circumstances of each engagement. The framework is built on (1) making...

  • Managing for Results: Opportunities for Continued Improvements in Agencies' Performance Plans: GGD/AIMD-99-215.  // GAO Reports;7/20/1999, p1 

    Reports on the results of the General Accounting Office's evaluation of administrative agencies in the U.S. as of 1999. Recognition of the effects of external factors for achieving performance goals; Lack of information on data verification and validation in performance goals and plans.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics