TITLE

15 New Bridge St overturns bans on British football fans

AUTHOR(S)
Robins, Jon
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Lawyer;8/22/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 33, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the decision of a district judge in July 2005 ruling that the eight British football fans deported from Portugal during the Euro 2004 soccer tournament were not to be banned from attending future matches as they had not received fair trials. Case brief; Complaints against the fans; Indications that the trial has not been equitable.
ACCESSION #
18075770

 

Related Articles

  • NIQAB SUBJECT TO NEW COURT RULES.  // Herizons;Spring2013, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p15 

    The article offers information on the Canadian Supreme Court ruling over the conditions to balance a fair trial of niqab-wearing complainant's rights against those of the accused. It states that the ruling involved the court case N.S. vs. R., related to a sexual assault complainant who wears a...

  • Fair Trial and Free Press: A Due Process Proposal: The Challenge of the Communications Media. Landau, Jack C. // American Bar Association Journal;Jan1976, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p55 

    Outlines the problems raised by restrictive orders from the news media's point of view. Constitutional controversy over fair trial-free press; Rights of the press to report on the courts; Due process hearing prior to issuance of restrictive orders.

  • Rethinking the Ethical Ban on Criminal Contingent Fees: A Commonsense Approach to Asset Forfeiture[A]. Godfrey, Lindsey N. // Texas Law Review;May2001, Vol. 79 Issue 6, p1699 

    Argues that criminal defendants, in the United States, whose assets have been frozen should, with proper supervision and protections, be permitted to contract with attorneys for contingent representation. Brief history of criminal contingent fees; Application of the Comprehensive Forfeiture...

  • Fair trial and the Australian Constitution. Wheeler, Fiona // Legaldate;Jul2005, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p7 

    This article provides information on fair trial and its representation on the Australian Constitution. The right to a fair trial is an important guarantee of individual liberty. This undermines fidelity to law in a society. The importance of the right to a fair trial, especially when criminal...

  • Procedure to Substance-- Extra-Judicial Rise of Due Process, 1830-1860. Graham, Howard Jay // California Law Review;Winter52/53, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p483 

    Presents information on the history of the U.S. due process-law. Popular usage of the law; Due process phraseology; Implementation of the law by the Civil War generation.

  • Were There More Acceptable Alternatives to the Iraqi High Tribunal? de Bertodano, Sylvia // Journal of International Criminal Justice;May2007, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p294 

    The Iraqi High Tribunal has been criticized on all sides for its failure to deliver fair trials. Many observers have advocated an international or internationalized court instead. However, these alternatives, even if desirable, were outside the ambit of what was possible in post-war Iraq. Given...

  • Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Special Measures Directions�Compliance with Article 6. Hoyano, Laura // Journal of Criminal Law;Dec2005, Vol. 69 Issue 6, p488 

    The article focuses on the requirement for cases from the youth courts in Great Britain, to comply with Article Six of the European Convention on Human Rights. The witnesses in trials involving charges of sex, violence, neglect or kidnapping are deemed in need of special protection. It is apt...

  • 12 RACIST MEN: POST-VERDICT EVIDENCE OF JUROR BIAS. West, Jessica L. // Harvard Journal on Racial & Ethnic Justice;Spring2011, Vol. 27, p165 

    The article explores the Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) which precludes post-verdict evidence of juror statements or actions indicating bias during the deliberative processes in the U.S. It describes several instances of juror bias and other types of misrepresentations. It also explains the...

  • Can a Lawyer Be Defended?  // America;1/21/1922, Vol. 26 Issue 14, p329 

    The author defends the actions of the lawyers of an accused murderer to apply for a change of venue and claim that a fair trial cannot be obtained in the city where the crime allegedly took place. Despite the confession of the accused that he is guilty, the author maintains that the defense of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics