TITLE

Content- Based Sign Law Ruled Invalid

AUTHOR(S)
Lawlor, James
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Planning;Aug/Sep2005, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p49
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the ruling given by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the case "LLC v. City of Neptune Beach." According to the ruling, a sign ordinance that exempts certain signs is unconstitutional. In 2003, Solantic, an emergency medical facility in Neptune Beach, Florida, installed an electronic sign with flashing and scrolling messages. The city cited the company for failing to get a permit and for violating the ordinance's ban on signs with "visible movement." The Neptune Beach ordinance exempts some signs based on the entity posting them or on their content, the court continued. For example, because the rule does not limit the display of holiday decorations, a homeowner could keep multicolored flashing lights up year round. But a political campaign sign can stay up for only 14 days.
ACCESSION #
18021660

 

Related Articles

  • Court rules worker's suit not 'advertising' injury. Stiegler, Mayo H. // Business Insurance;7/14/2003, Vol. 37 Issue 28, p10 

    Presents news briefs related to developments in the business insurance industry of the U.S. as of July 14, 2003. Judgment passed by the sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a worker's suit against his former employer for tortious interference with economic advantage; Decision taken by an...

  • Plaintiffs Entitled to Trial on Discrimination Claims Based on Employer's English-Only Policy.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Maldonado versus City of Altus. The Court has held that several Hispanic plaintiffs should be permitted to go to trial on their claims that their employer's English-only policy violates federal...

  • Court Vacates Ruling in Oklahoma City Desegregation Suit. Snider, William // Education Week;9/27/1989, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p5 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit had withdrawn its ruling on the desegregation suit filed before them in Oklahoma City. The said desegregation suit, as believed by the civil-rights experts, might become a basis on how and when school-desegregation cases...

  • YOU BE THE JUDGE. Donaldson, William // Saturday Evening Post;4/12/1952, Vol. 224 Issue 41, p111 

    The article focuses on the 1935 decision of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a lawsuit involving a lumber company and the insurance firm. According to the court, the insurance firm did not have to pay. The policy was intended to cover only direct fire damage to the insured property, and did...

  • Appeals Court Ruling Leaves Wineries Whining. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2003, Vol. 13 Issue 140, p66 

    Reports on the ruling of the 4th Circuit Appeals Court prohibiting North Carolina wineries from selling directly to consumers in the state. Argument of the plaintiffs; Implications of the ruling; Observations of the Appeals Court.

  • Court Hands Victory To Game Makers. Miller, Julie // Corporate Legal Times;Nov2005, Vol. 15 Issue 168, p75 

    The article reports on the decision of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of video game maker's intellectual property in Saint Louis, Missouri. The court ruled that hobbyists who tinkered with their favorite games to modify them infringed that video game maker's intellectual property. In...

  • Northern Securities v. United States (1904).  // Constitution & the Nation: The Regulatory State, 1890-1945;2003, Vol. 24, p57 

    The article discusses the case between the Northern Securities and the U.S. government regarding the regulation of trusts on behalf of the public welfare. It mentions the opinion of the U.S. Circuit Court concerning the Securities Company who made itself a party to a combination in limitation of...

  • House Arrest/Home Detention.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p99 

    The article discusses the rejection of the U.S. 10th Circuit on Aetano Izzo's request for the Elderly Offender Home Detention Pilot Program by Second Chance Act due to age of 70. U.S. Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the district court first reject the request as Izzo is imprisoned less than 75% of...

  • R-CALF stymied.  // BEEF;Oct2007, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p74 

    The article reports on the contradictory approach by Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund (R-CALF) regarding the decision of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to import Canadian cattle into the U.S. The group have argued that U.S. Depart of Agriculture (USDA)'s plan to allow the importation...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics