TITLE

HIV Legal Precedent Useful for Microbial Forensics

AUTHOR(S)
Budowle, Bruce; Harmon, Rockne
PUB. DATE
August 2005
SOURCE
Croatian Medical Journal;2005, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p514
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The field of microbial forensics was formalized because of the need for attribution in events where a bioweapon has been used. Microbial forensics has its origins in traditional forensics, microbiology, and epidemiology. Microbial forensics can be defined as a scientific discipline dedicated to analyzing evidence for attribution purposes from a bioterrorism act, biocrime, hoax, or inadvertent microorganism/toxin release. This is a very challenging task, since there are myriad microorganisms that can pose a threat, and analytical methods need to be used reliably. The Scientific Working Group on Microbial Genetics and Forensics (SWGMGF) has addressed some quality assurance and control issues, and particularly validation criteria (focusing on preliminary validation) due to the dynamic nature of evolving investigations. Unique identification of a microorganism may never be possible. Yet, qualitative and/or quantitative assessments of the evidence can be made. One approach to provide direction on gaps in the microbial forensics effort is to perform an end-to-end retrospective analysis of past cases. As an example, the case of a gastroenterologist who was accused of second degree attempted murder of his paramour using HIV as the weapon was reviewed. The scientific evaluation involves epidemiology, molecular biology, phylogenetics, and legal deliberations.
ACCESSION #
18007838

 

Related Articles

  • Endemism Versus Dispersion: Contribution of Microbial Genetics for Forensic Evidences. Araujo, Ricardo // Open Forensic Science Journal;2010 Special Issue, p14 

    The characterization, analysis and validation of evidence that concludes the description of an intentional act of biocrime or bioterrorism represent the main target of microbial forensics. But, even nowadays with the most recent technical advances, it remains extremely difficult,...

  • War of words deepens divide over biodefence funds. Marris, Emma // Nature;4/14/2005, Vol. 434 Issue 7035, p813 

    Reports on the debate on whether the influx of cash for studies on potential bioweapons is draining vital resources from basic research in the United States. Role in increasing the risk from natural disease outbreaks; Complaint of microbiologists against the decreased funding for studies on...

  • BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM: LEGAL MEASURES FOR PREVENTING CATASTROPHE. Kellman, Barry // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2001, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p417 

    Discusses the legal initiatives that might reduce the risks of bioterrorism, recognizing that the initiatives must be combined with nonlegal policies. Why attack with biological weapons; Pathogens that may be used; Ways to devise the attack; Restriction of access to pathogens and weaponizing...

  • Reducing the Bioweapons Threat: International Collaboration Efforts. Eitzen Jr., Edward M. // Public Health Reports;Sep2001 Supplement 2, Vol. 116 Issue 5, p17 

    Focuses on bioterrorism. Reason behind the concern of the U.S. on bioterrorism; Motivation of countries that develop biological weapons; Aspects of bioterrorism.

  • Integrating the AGENTS OF BIOTERRORISM into the General Biology Curriculum. Pommerville, Jeffrey // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache;Nov/Dec2002, Vol. 64 Issue 9, p649 

    Provides information on bioterrorism. Uses of biological weapons; Reason for using the weapons; Diseases of bioterror agents.

  • Bioweapons: NEW LABS, MORE TERROR? Choffnes, Eileen // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep/Oct2002, Vol. 58 Issue 5, p29 

    Presents information on the first anthrax letter mailed in the U.S. on September 18, 2001. Background on anthrax; Actions taken by the U.S. government in response to the biological terror threat; Problems with the increased investments in biological defense; Effect of the weapons treaty on the...

  • Trail of terror. MacKenzie, Debora // New Scientist;10/27/2001, Vol. 172 Issue 2314, p4 

    Reports on the threat of terrorist attacks using biological weapons, such as anthrax, against the United States. Speculation regarding the source of the anthrax strain; Targets and victims of anthrax attacks in the U.S.; Background information on anthrax and its use as a biochemical weapon.

  • Out of the blue. Westphal, Sylvia Pagan; Zandonella, Catherine // New Scientist;10/27/2001, Vol. 172 Issue 2314, p6 

    Focuses on the constant threat of terrorist attacks against the United States. Impracticality of vaccinating the American public against biochemical attacks; Recommendations on how to deal with biochemical weapons; Best defense for biochemical attacks against the U.S.

  • Bioterrorism. Kortepeter, Mark G.; Cieslak, Theodore J.; Eitzen, Edward M. // Journal of Environmental Health;Jan/Feb2001, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p21 

    Abstract Although biological agents have been used in warfare for centuries, several events in the past decade have raised concerns that they could be used for terrorism. Revelations about the sophisticated biological-weapons programs of the former Soviet Union and Iraq have heightened concern...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics